1991
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(1991)117:1(25)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsurface Microirrigation with Effluent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
8

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
16
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In a related study, more than 90% of spray-irrigated lettuce had E. coli 0157:H7, whereas less than 20% of surface-irrigated lettuce did (Solomon et al 2002). Comparing furrow and drip kits, this study confirmed that furrow-irrigated lettuce is more contaminated (Oron et al 1991(Oron et al , 1995. This is because furrows are often filled with irrigation water at the time of application, which causes more soil wetting leading to lettuce contamination from soils.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In a related study, more than 90% of spray-irrigated lettuce had E. coli 0157:H7, whereas less than 20% of surface-irrigated lettuce did (Solomon et al 2002). Comparing furrow and drip kits, this study confirmed that furrow-irrigated lettuce is more contaminated (Oron et al 1991(Oron et al , 1995. This is because furrows are often filled with irrigation water at the time of application, which causes more soil wetting leading to lettuce contamination from soils.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…When evaluating wheat yield, they found a response between 6.19 and 6.87 Mg ha -1 with the application of residual water, indicating that the nutrients present in water can be enough for an optimal growth of the crop. Al-Nakshabandi et al (1997) and Oron et al (1991) also observed an increase in yields when applying residual waters, indicating that the production is favored with the sole application of waste water. Kiziloglu et al (2007) reported an N increase of 0.18% in the soil, at a depth of 30 cm, and a greater yield in the cultivation of cabbage irrigated with residual water, as compared to the yield obtained with irrigation water.…”
Section: Nitrogen Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Assuming a cost of N equivalent to urea ($1675 MX pesos Mg -1 ), the application of urban residual water for crop production represents savings, as is indicated by the following cases: in Saudi Arabia, the 300 kg N ha -1 applied to wheat crops by Hussain et al (1996), represent $ 502.5, the 200 kg N ha -1 applied by Oron et al (1991), correspond to $ 335, and the applications done by Hussain and Al-Jaloud (1998, represent USD $ 251.25 (for the 150 kg N ha -1 ). The application of residual water in Valle del Mezquital represents an investment per hectare that varies from $335.00 MX pesos, for a dosage of 200 kg N, to $1340.00 MX pesos with applications of 800 kg N ha -1 (Hernández et al, 1993).…”
Section: Economic Value Of Residual Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drainfield is generally composed of a series of media-filled trenches that are approximately 90 cm wide and 60 to 90 cm deep, with a minimum of 270 cm distance between the centers of the neighboring trenches. For areas where the soils have limitations for a conventional system, an alternative system, such as low-pressure pipe distribution system , areal fill (NCGA, 2005), or a drip system (Oron et al, 1991), are used for disposing of wastewater within the drainfield.…”
Section: Septic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%