2002
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.10336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtelomeric translocations are not a frequent cause of recurrent miscarriages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are similar to those of Rio et al (9). A history of repeat miscarriages does not appear to be a good indicator and thus was not part of our inclusion criteria (5,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These findings are similar to those of Rio et al (9). A history of repeat miscarriages does not appear to be a good indicator and thus was not part of our inclusion criteria (5,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As far as we know, all the similar studies have reported only three cases with subtelomeric chromosomal rearrangements in a total of 175 couples (4)(5)(6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, most pregnancies with major fetal malformations are terminated making it difficult to evaluate the extent of this overlap. The malformations diagnosed in the patients described here were generally more severe than the ones seen in patients with mental retardation and it could have been expected that only large chromosomal rearrangements would have been implicated as is the case for couples with recurrent spontaneous abortions [Benzacken et al, 2002; Fan and Zhang, 2002; Cockwell et al, 2003]. However, one must consider that the standard cytogenetic resolution with amniocytes is lower than with lymphocytes [Horsman, 1994].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%