“…Consequently, a number of delimiters were defined. The following exclusion criteria were applied to form a final pool of studies on examiner errors committed when a standard Wechsler battery was administered to an examinee, which characterizes applied practice: (a) studies of examiner errors on a single subtest or small group of subtests that did not combine to form a standard test battery (e.g., an examination of errors on the Similarities, Vocabulary, and Comprehension subtests only; Linger, Ray, Zachar, Underhill, & LoBello, 2007), (b) studies that used fabricated protocols (e.g., Hopwood & Richard, 2005), (c) studies in which the same protocols were scored by multiple raters (e.g., Brazelton, Jackson, Buckhalt, Shapiro, & Byrd, 2003; Oakland, Lee, & Axelrad, 1975), (d) studies reported solely in a foreign language (e.g., Figueiredo, Araújo, Dias, & Busetti, 2010), (e) studies in which some type of imputation procedure was applied to missing data prior to analyses (e.g., Faust, 2011), (f) studies in which graduate student examiner errors between a “business as usual” control group and an experimental condition not traditionally present in graduate coursework on intelligence testing (e.g., computer-assisted instruction, Hall, 1999; all protocols double-checked by graduate assistant prior to examination, Kuentzel, Hetterscheidt, & Barnett, 2011) were compared, and (g) studies that reported data in an unusable format (e.g., errors defined by scores on a test administration and scoring competency test, Blakely, Fantuzzo, & Moon, 1987). It should be noted that the aforementioned exclusion criteria are not mutually exclusive and some studies met more than one criterion (e.g., Bradley, Hanna, and Lucas, 1980) required all participants to score the same two fabricated protocols and subsequently recorded their errors).…”