2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2013.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtidal temperature variability in stratified shelf water off the mid-east coast of Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presumed cross-shore geostrophy is consistent with the observed thermal wind balance in the SWES region (inshore of the ESROB) [Cho et al, 2014]. The BCPG (high-density offshore) and CF terms are positive, and the RES x term is reasonably thought to represent primarily the cross-shore BTPG, hence, a geostrophic balance.…”
Section: 1002/2016gl069322supporting
confidence: 76%
“…The presumed cross-shore geostrophy is consistent with the observed thermal wind balance in the SWES region (inshore of the ESROB) [Cho et al, 2014]. The BCPG (high-density offshore) and CF terms are positive, and the RES x term is reasonably thought to represent primarily the cross-shore BTPG, hence, a geostrophic balance.…”
Section: 1002/2016gl069322supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Interannual variations in the coefficients of the CTW model, F 1 , b 1 , c 1 , and a 1 because of the changes in stratification are not considered here, which might alter the results for v CTW . In the given range of N variation from spring to summer near the coast (~0.2 rad/s; Cho et al, ), which is an order of magnitude larger than the range in interannual N variation (~0.03 rad/s) estimated from the ESROB conductivity‐temperature‐depth data, b 1 , c 1 , and F 1 are rather insensitive to the N variation. Even if a 1 changes by a factor of 2 as is the case of the seasonal N variation, the bottom frictional length scale (6,250 km) is still sufficiently long compared to the distance between the remote forcing location and the ESROB (~1,000 km) such that the effect on a 1 with a change in N is negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…where c n , a n , and b n are the phase velocity, frictional decaying coefficient, and wind coupling coefficient of the n th mode CTWs, respectively. Here only the first mode CTWs playing a dominant role in the observed variance is of concern and the summer mean c 1 , a 1 , and b 1 applied in Cho et al () are used. The alongshore current driven by the CTWs is defined as ν CTW = − (1/ pf Δ x ) ϕ .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The c-SSLA is modulated by set-down and set-up of SSLA along the Korean coast by remote wind forcing over the western part of the EJS. The c-SSLA variations are produced mainly due to the southward propagation of Kelvin and shelf waves, or more generally costal trapped waves Cho et al 2014), which were generated by sea level set-down (set-up) along the east coast of Korea by southerly (northerly) wind stress over the EJS. Altered c-SSLA by long wave propagation intensifies or relaxes CM1 current in the strait.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jacobs et al (2005) suggested that northerly (southerly) wind stress over the western part of the EJS sets up (down) a sea level along the east Korean coast, and these wind-forced sea level fluctuations propagate southward to the KS as Kelvin waves and change barotropic geostrophic transport through the KS. Coastal trapped waves propagating southward along the east coast of Korea were reported by Lee and Chung (1982), and recently Cho et al (2014) modelled the southward propagation of remote windforced coastal trapped waves off the east coast of Korea. These physical processes of sea level variations in the KS may be relevant in explaining the variations of c-SSLA and CM1.…”
Section: Wind Forcingmentioning
confidence: 95%