TailingReversible protection
MALDI
Resistant subpopulation a b s t r a c tThis study investigates the mechanisms underlying the deviation from ChickeWatson kinetics, namely a tailing curve, during the disinfection of viruses by chlorine dioxide (ClO 2 ). Tailing has been previously reported, but is typically attributed to the decay in disinfectant concentration. Herein, it is shown that tailing occurs even at constant ClO 2 concentrations. Four working hypothesis to explain the cause of tailing were tested, specifically changes in the solution's disinfecting capacity, aggregation of viruses, resistant virus subpopulations, and changes in the virus properties during disinfection. In experiments using MS2 as a model virus, it was possible to rule out the solution's disinfecting capacity, virus aggregation and the resistant subpopulation as reasons for tailing. Instead, the cause for tailing is the deposition of an adduct onto the virus capsid over the course of the experiment, which protects the viruses. This adduct could easily be removed by washing, which restored the susceptibility of the viruses to ClO 2 . This finding highlights an important shortcoming of ClO 2 , namely its self-limiting effect on virus disinfection. It is important to take this effect into account in treatment applications to ensure that the water is sufficiently disinfected before human consumption. ª 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
IntroductionChlorination is among the oldest and most commonly used disinfection process worldwide. However, over the years it has been shown that chlorine produces harmful by-products such as trihalomethanes and other halogenated compounds with potential carcinogenic effects (Xie, 2004). It is therefore of interest to investigate other disinfectants that have a similar disinfection potential but generate fewer problematic byproducts. As a good alternative, chlorine dioxide (ClO 2 ) has shown to efficiently disinfect water for human consumption (Huang et al., 1997;Jin et al., 2013;Zoni et al., 2007).Importantly, it is effective at inactivating Cryptosporidium, whereas free chlorine is not (Chauret et al., 2001). Except from exhibiting a good disinfection capacity, ClO 2 can also oxidize iron and manganese, as well as help controlling taste and odor compounds (Aieta and Berg, 1986;Li et al., 1996). The disadvantage of using chlorine dioxide is that it reacts to chlorite, which may be neurotoxic at high doses (Xie, 2004). In 1908, Chick published the first model for describing bacteria inactivation by disinfecting agents (Chick, 1908) Available online at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.else vier.com/locate /wa tres w a t e r r e s e a r c h 4 8 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 8 2 e8 90043-1354/$ e see front matter ª