2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtype-selective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists can improve cognitive flexibility in an attentional set shifting task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous study demonstrated that TC-2403 facilitated ED set-shifting in rats and that this effect was blocked by DHβE [25]. The improvement in rats' ED performance was also demonstrated after the administration of 5IA-85380, a β2-nAChR-selective agonist [31]. The current results corroborate these findings by demonstrating the potential of an α4β2-nAChR PAM to facilitate cognitive flexibility in an α4β2-nAChR-dependent manner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our previous study demonstrated that TC-2403 facilitated ED set-shifting in rats and that this effect was blocked by DHβE [25]. The improvement in rats' ED performance was also demonstrated after the administration of 5IA-85380, a β2-nAChR-selective agonist [31]. The current results corroborate these findings by demonstrating the potential of an α4β2-nAChR PAM to facilitate cognitive flexibility in an α4β2-nAChR-dependent manner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We conjectured that such a combined learning and attention paradigm is needed to clarify open questions about subreceptor specific functions. In particular, an exhaustive literature survey of attention effects of fourteen studies applying systemically α7 agonists (Table S1) (Briggs CA et al 1997;Hahn B et al 2003;Buccafusco JJ et al 2007;Buccafusco JJ and AV Terry, Jr. 2009;Rezvani AH et al 2009; Wallace TL, PM Callahan, et al 2011;McLean SL et al 2012;Gould RW et al 2013;Yang Y et al 2013;Young JW et al 2013;Jones KM et al 2014;Kolisnyk B et al 2015;Wood C et al Nicotinic sub-receptor specific modulation of learning and attention 2016;Wadenberg MG et al 2017), and thirteen studies using α4β2 agonists (Table S2) (Buccafusco JJ et al 1995;Decker MW et al 1997;Schneider JS et al 1999;Schneider JS et al 2003;Decamp E and JS Schneider 2006;Buccafusco JJ et al 2007;Howe WM et al 2010;Gould RW et al 2013;Paolone G et al 2013;Kolisnyk B et al 2015;Terry AV, Jr. et al 2016;Wood C et al 2016) failed to reveal sub-receptor specific contributions to working memory and distractor filtering functions in the NHP animal model.…”
Section: Nicotinic Sub-receptor Specific Modulation Of Learning and Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ␣4␤2 nicotinic receptor (␣4␤2-nAChR) is of interest given its high affinity for nicotine and its relationship to cigarette smoking (Picciotto and Kenny, 2013;McClure-Begley et al, 2016), its widespread distribution in brain (Han et al, 2000), and its links to cognitive processing. For example, genetic alterations in the ␣4 subunit in humans have been associated with altered cognitive and attentional abilities (Reinvang et al, 2009;Espeseth et al, 2010;Mobascher et al, 2016) and possibly to greater incidence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Kent et al, 2001;Winterer et al, 2007;Wallis et al, 2009). Similarly, genetic knockdown or blockade of nicotinic ␣4 and/or ␤2 nicotinic subunits impairs, whereas stimulation improves, attentional processing in rodent models (Guillem et al, 2011;Bloem et al, 2014;Wood et al, 2016) and stimulation of the cholinergic basal forebrain can enhance visual processing in the visual cortex through muscarinic receptors (Goard and Dan, 2009).…”
Section: Significance Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, genetic alterations in the ␣4 subunit in humans have been associated with altered cognitive and attentional abilities (Reinvang et al, 2009;Espeseth et al, 2010;Mobascher et al, 2016) and possibly to greater incidence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Kent et al, 2001;Winterer et al, 2007;Wallis et al, 2009). Similarly, genetic knockdown or blockade of nicotinic ␣4 and/or ␤2 nicotinic subunits impairs, whereas stimulation improves, attentional processing in rodent models (Guillem et al, 2011;Bloem et al, 2014;Wood et al, 2016) and stimulation of the cholinergic basal forebrain can enhance visual processing in the visual cortex through muscarinic receptors (Goard and Dan, 2009). Research in monkeys has also shown prominent muscarinic effects on attentional enhancement of visual processing in V1 (Herrero et al, 2008), but only limited influences of nicotinic receptor stimulation (Disney et al, 2007).…”
Section: Significance Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation