2020
DOI: 10.18632/aging.103437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtype-specific risk models for accurately predicting the prognosis of breast cancer using differentially expressed autophagy-related genes

Abstract: Emerging evidence suggests that the dysregulation of autophagy-related genes (ARGs) is coupled with the carcinogenesis and progression of breast cancer (BRCA). We constructed three subtype-specific risk models using differentially expressed ARGs. In Luminal, Her-2, and Basal-like BRCA, four- ( BIRC5 , PARP1 , ATG9B , and TP63 ), three- ( ITPR1 , CCL2 , and GAPDH … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baoai Han et al found that the BIRC5 gene was more strongly expressed in TNBC patients compared to other molecular breast cancer subtypes and control [ 65 ]. According to the available data, it can be assumed that the BIRC5 gene may be a factor involved in tumor formation and the processes of disease invasion and progression [ 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baoai Han et al found that the BIRC5 gene was more strongly expressed in TNBC patients compared to other molecular breast cancer subtypes and control [ 65 ]. According to the available data, it can be assumed that the BIRC5 gene may be a factor involved in tumor formation and the processes of disease invasion and progression [ 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gene at the minimum of the Akaike information criterion (AIC) was calculated and used as the variable to be included in the model, and each patient's gene expression level was used to evaluate the risk score, with the algorithm according to the previous studies [ 14 , 15 ]. The median risk score of each patient is considered the reference standard for classifying the high and low groups, followed by the analysis of the survival of the two groups and drawing the survival curves using the Kaplan-Meier method (K-M method) [ 16 ]. In virtue of the critical parameters and model scores and in combination with various clinical factors, we drew a clinically relevant nomogram to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, and the scales on nomograms represented the numerical ranges of each variable [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where coefx is the regression coefficient obtained from multivariate Cox regression analysis, and Exprx represents the gene expression level of each variable (24,25). The median risk score of each patient was taken as the reference standard for dividing the high and low groups, and then the Kaplan-Meier method (K-M method) was used to analyze the survival of the two groups and draw the survival curves (26). In order to avoid mutual influence between risk factors, we conducted principal component analysis (PCA) and dimension reduction.…”
Section: Model Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%