The Wiley International Handbook on Psychopathic Disorders and the Law 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781119159322.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtypes and Variations of Psychopathic Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By explicitly considering an antisocial component, the PSCD may also help better connect the child and adolescent literature on psychopathy with the adult literature on PCL-R measured psychopathy, defined as a superordinate construct underpinned by four correlated first-order components. To illustrate, in line with PCL-R research (Mokros et al, 2020), the four components of the PSCD may allow for the use of latent profile analysis to uncover subtypes of youth with psychopathic features and conduct problems (see also Colins et al, 2018). Hence, to ascertain that the PSCD will advance our understanding of psychopathy, especially as it relates to CD, this novel tool must first undergo further psychometric evaluation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By explicitly considering an antisocial component, the PSCD may also help better connect the child and adolescent literature on psychopathy with the adult literature on PCL-R measured psychopathy, defined as a superordinate construct underpinned by four correlated first-order components. To illustrate, in line with PCL-R research (Mokros et al, 2020), the four components of the PSCD may allow for the use of latent profile analysis to uncover subtypes of youth with psychopathic features and conduct problems (see also Colins et al, 2018). Hence, to ascertain that the PSCD will advance our understanding of psychopathy, especially as it relates to CD, this novel tool must first undergo further psychometric evaluation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the profiles diverged somewhat from previous findings. Specifically, the Callous-Conning profile had a considerably higher PCL-R interpersonal score than C3 but only a slightly higher (though statistically significant) affective score; this difference in affective scores was not as pronounced as in other research (e.g., Krstic et al, 2018;Mokros et al, 2021). In other words, individuals in the Externalizing profile were nearly as callous as those in C2, though less superficially charming, deceptive, and manipulative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In Hicks and Drislane’s (2018) review, it is unclear if samples of “secondary” variants in the reviewed studies described the “aggressive” variant of primary psychopathy or individuals who appear somewhat psychopathic but with different etiologies underlying their presentation. Relatedly, the unsystematic nature of the psychopathy subtyping literature has led to studies identifying anywhere from two to five antisocial profiles (Mokros et al, 2021; Neumann et al, 2016). For example, Poythress et al (2010) identified four antisocial profiles (i.e., Primary Psychopathy; Secondary Psychopathy; Fearful Psychopathy; Nonpsychopathic Antisocial) in a sample of 610 incarcerated men diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder.…”
Section: Lpa Of Full Range (Total) Pcl-r Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both subtypes are prone to antisociality, however, only a small number of antisocial individuals meet the more specific criteria of “true” (primary) psychopathy, defined through personality traits like fearlessness (e.g., Hare, 2003; Widiger et al., 1996; see also section III of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM‐5; American Psychiatric Association, DSM‐5 Task Force, 2013]). The distinction between primary and secondary psychopathy was confirmed recently by several other clinicians (see Mokros et al., 2020, for an overview) and received support from cluster‐based studies (e.g., Mokros et al., 2015; Olver et al., 2015; Poythress et al., 2010; Skeem et al., 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%