The crucial discovery of the excitatory properties of acidic amino acids [2][3][4][5] lead only gradually and with considerable delay, to the formulation of the hypothesis of the synaptic role of L-glutamate in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) 6-9) (for reviews of early history of amino acid research, see [10][11][12][13] ). It may never be possible to identify any single experimental study after which L-glutamate became unequivocally accepted as the most important excitatory synaptic transmitter in the brain and spinal cord, but, it is certain that the discovery of the "high affinity uptake" accumulating L-glutamate into "synaptosomes" 14,15) (for reviews see 13,16,17) ) was an important step in the development of the concept of the glutamatergic neurotransmission in the CNS. As a putative mechanism for the necessary removal and inactivation of extracellular L-glutamate it provided a target for pharmacological studies and helped to establish a neurochemical link between L-glutamate and the mechanisms of synaptic transmission. 13,18,19) Most of the latter experiments were carried out in vitro using tissue "mini-slices" prepared from the rat cerebral cortex or cat spinal cord (for details of the methodology see 20,21) ). Rather than disrupting the nervous tissue by homogenization, the technique was using what might be called "neurochemical dissection". In more specific terms, it examined a large number of compounds, mostly glutamate and aspartate analogues but also a range of drugs, for possible effects on L-glutamate transport (GluT). Such approach had a potential to yield valuable information on the molecular properties of the substrate-recognition site on GluT,19) but, also, by testing neuroactive compounds with known sites of actions in brain, it helped to formulate hypotheses defining the most probable functions of the GluT in the mechanisms of the excitatory synaptic transmission.The pharmacology and biochemistry of GluT was later extensively investigated in cultured glial cells [22][23][24] (for a review see 25) ) but it was the data obtained in anaesthetised animals, using compounds (D-and L-threo-3-hydroxyaspartate, DL-t3OHA) identified earlier as powerful specific inhibitors of [ 3 H]L-glutamate uptake in brain slices, 26) that provided the first convincing evidence that GluT could influence the excitatory actions of L-glutamate in vivo, at least in the cat spinal cord.27) Furthermore, if the inhibition of GluT in vivo caused an increase in the extracellular concentrations of L-glutamate then, given the neurotoxic nature of excessive glutamatergic excitation, 28,29) similar inhibition of GluT applied to functioning synapses should, under suitable experimental conditions, result in the appearance of neurodegeneration. Such experiment was indeed performed and it was shown that an injection of DL-t3OHA into the rat striatum could cause the death of brain cells in vivo.
30) HETEROGENEITY OF GLUTAMATE TRANSPORTDuring the 1980's and early 1990's, it became apparent that, in order to account for th...