2014
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtyping Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Using Temperament Dimensions

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Psychiatric nosology is limited by behavioral and biological heterogeneity within existing disorder categories. The imprecise nature of current nosologic distinctions limits both mechanistic understanding and clinical prediction. We demonstrate an approach consistent with the National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria initiative to identify superior, neurobiologically valid subgroups with better predictive capacity than existing psychiatric categories for childhood attention-defici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

23
287
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(314 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(104 reference statements)
23
287
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the deteriorated group, as originally pre- sis of the IQ classification analysis results presented here, which are supported by the volumetric differences. Overall, our findings confirm that schizophrenia may be classified on the basis of distinct subgroups related to IQ deterioration from premorbid levels, which may account for the neurobiological heterogeneity present in the illness, as shown in other disorders 22 in which temperament-based attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder subgroups were related to resting-state functional connectivity MRI. Lending further support to the existence of a distinct, severely deteriorated subset of patients with schizophrenia is our finding that this group had the largest and most widespread reductions based on cognitive, functional, emotional, and brain volumetric measures relative to healthy controls, which is generally consistent with the findings of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Thus, the deteriorated group, as originally pre- sis of the IQ classification analysis results presented here, which are supported by the volumetric differences. Overall, our findings confirm that schizophrenia may be classified on the basis of distinct subgroups related to IQ deterioration from premorbid levels, which may account for the neurobiological heterogeneity present in the illness, as shown in other disorders 22 in which temperament-based attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder subgroups were related to resting-state functional connectivity MRI. Lending further support to the existence of a distinct, severely deteriorated subset of patients with schizophrenia is our finding that this group had the largest and most widespread reductions based on cognitive, functional, emotional, and brain volumetric measures relative to healthy controls, which is generally consistent with the findings of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Comorbidities were somewhat less frequent in the ADHD group. Nevertheless, ADHD, as recently described by Karalunas et al, 2014, is not a uniform disorder but can further be divided into three subtypes by a biologically informed temperament-based typology, thus impulsivity and aggression might not be equally expressed in these three subtypes, which we did not differentiate. Furthermore, our MRS findings are not yet linked to other imaging parameters such as default mode network connectivity or task-related functional activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Rösler et al (2008), using a different scoring technique for the German version of the WRAADDS, reported a two-factor result in which the emotional items loaded on the same factor as hyperactivity. Finally, Karalunas et al (2014) published a report using a cluster analysis methodology and scores from a temperament scale to arrive at three types of ADHD children. One had prominent anger as a distinguishing feature, while a second evidenced high levels of positive approach motivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%