2009
DOI: 10.1080/00207450802319960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtyping Children's Reading Disabilities Using a Comprehensive Neuropsychological Measure

Abstract: This study examined subtypes of children with reading disabilities using the NEPSY (series of Neuropsychological tests authored by Marit Korkman, Ursula Kirk and Sally Kemp). Multiple methods of cluster analysis were performed with 80 elementary school-age children identified as reading disabled. Students completed the NEPSY Language Domain and the NEPSY Memory and Learning Domain. Three clusters emerged which were interpreted as: (1) a No Language or Memory Deficit Subtype, (2) a Global Language and Memory De… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other measures that are commonly used as part of psycho-educational assessment of SLDs include tests of memory and learning (e.g., the Children's Memory Scale; Cohen, Ledbetter, Vaughn, & Benavides, 1999), neuro-cognitive functioning (e.g., the NEPSY-2; Crews & D’Amato, 2009) and cognitive processes (e.g., Cognitive Assessment System; Naglieri, 2003). Some authors have argued that a ‘multiple deficits’ approach should be adopted, with cross-battery psycho-educational testing for specific cognitive impairments that are known to represent important markers, for reading difficulties in particular (see, e.g., Callinan et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other measures that are commonly used as part of psycho-educational assessment of SLDs include tests of memory and learning (e.g., the Children's Memory Scale; Cohen, Ledbetter, Vaughn, & Benavides, 1999), neuro-cognitive functioning (e.g., the NEPSY-2; Crews & D’Amato, 2009) and cognitive processes (e.g., Cognitive Assessment System; Naglieri, 2003). Some authors have argued that a ‘multiple deficits’ approach should be adopted, with cross-battery psycho-educational testing for specific cognitive impairments that are known to represent important markers, for reading difficulties in particular (see, e.g., Callinan et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%