2012
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01237-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subtyping Influenza A Virus with Monoclonal Antibodies and an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay

Abstract: The recent association of certain influenza A virus subtypes with clinically relevant phenotypes has led to the increasing importance of subtyping by clinical virology laboratories. To provide clinical laboratories with a definitive immunofluorescence assay for the subtyping of influenza A virus isolates, we generated a panel of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against the major circulating influenza A virus subtypes using multiple inactivated H1N1, H3N2, and 2009 H1N1 strains individually as immunogens. Eleven MA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 By changing the specific antibodies used, this method can be modified to detect all types of influenza viruses. 21 To improve the accuracy of virus titration, we tried to control the activity of HA and NA by optimizing the culture media. Offspring influenza virus particles produced during the course of the ELISPOT titration assay may infect neighboring cells to form extra spots, resulting in a decrease in accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 By changing the specific antibodies used, this method can be modified to detect all types of influenza viruses. 21 To improve the accuracy of virus titration, we tried to control the activity of HA and NA by optimizing the culture media. Offspring influenza virus particles produced during the course of the ELISPOT titration assay may infect neighboring cells to form extra spots, resulting in a decrease in accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IFA was also used for direct detection of HSV antigen in clinical specimens with sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 95.7%, compared to the tissue culture method [ 151 ]. Moreover, IFA was applied for subtyping of influenza A virus with 100% agreement to RT-PCR [ 153 ]. IFA was also used for the detection of EBV [ 21 ] and as a confirmatory test for HIV-1 [ 154 ].…”
Section: Immunological Diagnostic Techniques Of Medical Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HI assay is laborious and time-consuming. The interpretation of the assay results between laboratories may be different as no standard reagents are available for the assay [ 153 , 157 , 166 ]. In case of IF assay, prolonged exposure of specimen to UV light leads to fading of fluorescence that could result in false-negative test [ 167 ].…”
Section: Immunological Diagnostic Techniques Of Medical Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complexity of the assays, the variations in detection sensitivity and specificity are probably caused by differences in technical expertise, specimen type, and quality (the presence of an adequate number of infected cells), as well as patient selection [27,47,48]. Even with the variation in detection sensitivity and their relatively extensive infrastructure requirements, the immunofluorescence staining methods have demonstrated high accuracy in detecting influenza virus and have been adapted for identification of specific influenza subtypes using monoclonal antibodies specific for HA subtypes, such as H1, H3, H5, and H7 [49][50][51]. DFA and IFA are valuable in confirming rapid diagnostic testing results [31,[52][53][54].…”
Section: Current Detection Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%