Suburothelial Bladder Contraction Detection with Implanted Pressure Sensor

Abstract

AimsManaging bladder pressure in patients with neurogenic bladders is needed to improve rehabilitation options, avoid upper tract damage, incontinence, and their associated co-morbidities and mortality. Current methods of determining bladder contractions are not amenable to chronic or ambulatory settings. In this study we evaluated detection of bladder contractions using a novel piezoelectric catheter-free pressure sensor placed in a suburothelial bladder location in animals.MethodsWired prototypes of the pressure monitor were implanted into 2 nonsurvival (feline and canine) and one 13-day survival (canine) animal. Vesical pressures were obtained from the device in both suburothelial and intraluminal locations and simultaneously from a pressure sensing catheter in the bladder. Intravesical pressure was monitored in the survival animal over 10 days from the suburothelial location and necropsy was performed to assess migration and erosion.ResultsIn the nonsurvival animals, the average correlation between device and reference catheter data was high during both electrically stimulated bladder contractions and manual compressions (r = 0.93±0.03, r = 0.89±0.03). Measured pressures correlated strongly (r = 0.98±0.02) when the device was placed in the bladder lumen. The survival animal initially recorded physiologic data, but later this deteriorated. However, endstage intraluminal device recordings correlated (r = 0.85±0.13) with the pressure catheter. Significant erosion of the implant through the detrusor was found.ConclusionsThis study confirms correlation between suburothelial pressure readings and intravesical bladder pressures. Due to device erosion during ambulatory studies, a wireless implant is recommended for clinical rehabilitation applications.

Design and Anchorage Dependence of Shape Memory Alloy Actuators on Enhanced Voiding of a Bladder

“…For this reason, using of flexible sensors, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] that could be fixed on the surface of bladder or inside the vest, may provide the information on the bladder filling status without the need of making an incision in the bladder wall. [44,45] In our study, we used a commercial FlexiForce force sensor (South Boston, MA) to accurately quantify the effect of bladder filling on the resistance change of the sensor. More information on the sensor is provided in the Experimental Section.…”

Detection and quantification of overactive bladder activity in patients: Can we make it better and automatic?

“…Our study could lead to automatic closed‐loop‐systems for conditional bladder stimulators . This could be achieved for example by embedding the proposed algorithm and fully implantable pressure transducers, such as the one recently developed by Melgaard et al or Majerus et al…”

Bladder pressure encoding by near-independent fibre subpopulations — implications for decoding

“…We analyse here data previously collected for a study of single-unit hysteresis [42] (experiments 1-5) and a comparison of bladder pressure decoding algorithms for the DRG [51] (experiments [6][7][8]. Full details of experimental procedures can be found in those respective publications.…”

“…To enable the use of feedback control, physiological quantities of interest may be measured by chemical, mechanical, or other sensors that are implanted in addition to the nerve interface [7,8,9,10,11,12]. While this approach seems straightforward from an engineering point of view, surgery becomes more difficult and the probability of complications (e.g., device movement, tissue damage, loss of signal [7,13]) post surgery rises. An alternative approach is to harness, where possible, the body's own sensors for monitoring and control of organs.…”