The syntheses of the transition metal complexes cis-[(4-tBu-2,6-{P(O)(OiPr)2}2C6H2SnCl)2MX2] (1, M = Pd, X = Cl; 2, M = Pd, X = Br; 3, M = Pd, X = I; 4, M = Pt, X = Cl), cis-[{2,6-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3SnCl}2MX2] (5, M = Pd, X = I; 6, M = Pt, X = Cl), trans-[{2,6-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3SnI}2PtI2] (7) and trans-[(4-tBu-2,6-{P(O)(OiPr)2}2C6H2SnCl)PdI2]2 (8) are reported. Also reported is the serendipitous formation of the unprecedented complexes trans-[(4-tBu-2,6-{P(O)(OiPr)2}2C6H2SnCl)2Pt(SnCl3)2] (10) and [(4-tBu-2,6-{P(O)(OiPr)2}2C6H2SnCl)3Pt(SnCl3)2] (11). The compounds were characterised by elemental analyses, (1)H, (13)C, (31)P, (119)Sn and (195)Pt NMR spectroscopy, single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, UV/Vis spectroscopy and, in the cases of compounds 1, 3 and 4, also by Mössbauer spectroscopy. All the compounds show the tin atoms in a distorted trigonal-bipyramidal environment. The Mössbauer spectra suggest the tin atoms to be present in the oxidation state III. The kinetic lability of the complexes was studied by redistribution reactions between compounds 1 and 3 as well as between 1 and cis-[{2,6-(Me2 NCH2)2C6H3SnCl}2PdCl2]. DFT calculations provided insights into both the bonding situation of the compounds and the energy difference between the cis and trans isomers. The latter is influenced by the donor strength of the pincer-type ligands.