Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2018
DOI: 10.24251/hicss.2018.432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Success Factors in Title III Equity Crowdfunding in the United States

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although unanimity among research findings exists regarding the influence of several campaign features such as campaign videos (Li et al, 2016;Vismara et al, 2017), minimum investment size (Hornuf and Schwienbacher, 2017;Lukkarinen et al, 2016), and campaign updates (Angerer et al, 2017;Block et al, 2018b;Hornuf and Schwienbacher, 2018;Li et al, 2016), venture characteristics such as previous funding from experienced investors (Kleinert et al,. 2018;Mamonov and Malaga, 2018), as well as herding behavior (Hornuf and Schwienbacher, 2018;Vismara, 2018a;Vulkan et al, 2016;Åstebro et al, 2018), contradictory results prevail as well. For example, it remains unclear whether campaign duration (Lukkarinen et al, 2016;Piva and Rossi-Lamastra, 2018;Vismara, 2018), the portion of equity retained by the entrepreneurs (Ahlers et al, 2015;Ralcheva and Roosenboom, 2016;Vismara, 2016), or intellectual property rights (Ahlers et al, 2015;Kleinert et al 2018;Piva and Rossi-Lamastra, 2018;Ralcheva and Roosenboom, 2016) influence funding success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although unanimity among research findings exists regarding the influence of several campaign features such as campaign videos (Li et al, 2016;Vismara et al, 2017), minimum investment size (Hornuf and Schwienbacher, 2017;Lukkarinen et al, 2016), and campaign updates (Angerer et al, 2017;Block et al, 2018b;Hornuf and Schwienbacher, 2018;Li et al, 2016), venture characteristics such as previous funding from experienced investors (Kleinert et al,. 2018;Mamonov and Malaga, 2018), as well as herding behavior (Hornuf and Schwienbacher, 2018;Vismara, 2018a;Vulkan et al, 2016;Åstebro et al, 2018), contradictory results prevail as well. For example, it remains unclear whether campaign duration (Lukkarinen et al, 2016;Piva and Rossi-Lamastra, 2018;Vismara, 2018), the portion of equity retained by the entrepreneurs (Ahlers et al, 2015;Ralcheva and Roosenboom, 2016;Vismara, 2016), or intellectual property rights (Ahlers et al, 2015;Kleinert et al 2018;Piva and Rossi-Lamastra, 2018;Ralcheva and Roosenboom, 2016) influence funding success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Focusing on the whether the startup offerings represent low-cost alternatives to existing services or entirely new offerings, we find that nine of ten startups (90%) in our sample are targeting lower price points in the respective markets, whereas only one startup -Cadre -is offering novel services. Cadre is a real estate investment platform that emerged in the wake of the JOBS Act passage that reduced regulator requirements in startup financing reporting and enabled equity crowdfunding as a practice [25]. The company is leveraging the regulatory changes to provide investors with novel investment opportunities that were previously only available to accredited investors [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cadre is a real estate investment platform that emerged in the wake of the JOBS Act passage that reduced regulator requirements in startup financing reporting and enabled equity crowdfunding as a practice [25]. The company is leveraging the regulatory changes to provide investors with novel investment opportunities that were previously only available to accredited investors [25]. The results are summarized in Table 1 below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, OnDeck began as a business-to-business (B2B) marketplace for business loans and evolved to include individual investors as an important source of capital on the platform [29]. There are two important distinctions between debt and equity-based crowdfunding platforms in terms of the investor risk/reward profile [27]. Debt-based crowdfunding platforms typically offer a fixed interest rate and repayment term (commonly 6-18 months), whereas equity-based crowdfunding generally offers little certainty for potential investors because new ventures typically take 5-7 years to return capital to investors and many entrepreneurial ventures lead to partial or complete loss of the investment [56].…”
Section: Crowdfundingmentioning
confidence: 99%