2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2013
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2013.503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Success of Multi Criteria Decision Support Systems: The Relevance of Trust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their findings indicate that perceived ease of use, compatibility and trustworthiness are significant predictors of citizens' intention to adopt technology. Similarly, other studies highlight trust as the key success factor in technology acceptance of multi criteria decision support systems in the case of high impact decisions [20]. We advance this argument and argue decision support can help promote judgment and dialogue with citizens thus providing rich material.…”
Section: Implications Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Their findings indicate that perceived ease of use, compatibility and trustworthiness are significant predictors of citizens' intention to adopt technology. Similarly, other studies highlight trust as the key success factor in technology acceptance of multi criteria decision support systems in the case of high impact decisions [20]. We advance this argument and argue decision support can help promote judgment and dialogue with citizens thus providing rich material.…”
Section: Implications Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Similarly, other studies highlight trust as the key success factor in technology acceptance of multi-criteria decision-support systems in the case of high impact decisions (Maida et al 2013). We advance this argument and argue decision support can help promote judgment and dialogue with citizens thus providing rich material.…”
Section: Implications Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Analysis is often utilized in Card Sorting to analyze card clusters through dendrograms (Baxter et al, 2015;Kaufman & Rousseeuw, 2005). In addition, other advanced statistical techniques can be found in the literature to quantitatively analyze Card Sorting data, such as distance analysis (Katsanos et al, 2019) using similarity matrices (Maida & Obwegeser, 2012). Some of them are represented by heatmaps (Schmettow & Sommer, 2016) to analyze relationships among cards visually.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%