2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Success Rate of 3 Injection Methods with Articaine for Mandibular First Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A CONSORT Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifty-four patients (43%) were excluded from the study as the IANB was deemed to have failed based on the subjective assessment of profound lip numbness as reported by the patient, as described by Shahi et al (2018). Although this is in line with success rate in the range of 30-97% for IANB in general, reported in the literature (Kanaa MD et al 2006), this limitation is acknowledged and the fact that application of an objective method of assessment such as use of an electronic pulp tester would have provided more certainty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fifty-four patients (43%) were excluded from the study as the IANB was deemed to have failed based on the subjective assessment of profound lip numbness as reported by the patient, as described by Shahi et al (2018). Although this is in line with success rate in the range of 30-97% for IANB in general, reported in the literature (Kanaa MD et al 2006), this limitation is acknowledged and the fact that application of an objective method of assessment such as use of an electronic pulp tester would have provided more certainty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Profound lip numbness within 15 minutes of IANB administration was considered as the criterion for IANB success (Shahi et al 2018). If lip numbness was not profound, the IANB was indicated as missed, and the patient was excluded from the study.…”
Section: Anaesthetic Solution Injections and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of periapical anaesthesia, anaesthesia was considered achieved when the patient did not feel pain in the affected tooth on percussion. In the inferior alveolar nerve block, anaesthesia was considered achieved when the lower lip was deeply numb (Shahi et al ). When the patient complained of pain at some stage of the treatment, anaesthesia was reinforced with intrapulpal anaesthesia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recommended to raise awareness among clinicians and patients to increase adherence to the post-EM control and maintenance process. evidence 65,66 exclusively focuses on either inferior dental nerve block in symptomatic pulp pain or extraction of third molars. This shows the lack of evidence for anesthetic options in EM.…”
Section: Good Practice Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%