2010
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
52
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Therefore, the clinical experience of the practitioner should be one main criterion for the appropriate selection of the restoration procedure of carious primary molars. Some studies have revealed higher pulpotomy success rates for teeth restored with SSCs (79.9-82.0%) than with amalgam (60.0-75.0%) 23,24 or resin-based materials, 25 but no data were found regarding the effect of pulp treatment on the clinical success rate of SSCs. In the present study, high clinical success rates of SSCs were reached regardless of performed pulp treatments or the extension of carious lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…22 Therefore, the clinical experience of the practitioner should be one main criterion for the appropriate selection of the restoration procedure of carious primary molars. Some studies have revealed higher pulpotomy success rates for teeth restored with SSCs (79.9-82.0%) than with amalgam (60.0-75.0%) 23,24 or resin-based materials, 25 but no data were found regarding the effect of pulp treatment on the clinical success rate of SSCs. In the present study, high clinical success rates of SSCs were reached regardless of performed pulp treatments or the extension of carious lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although restoration failure did not significantly influence the success of the pulpotomy (p=0.08), the risk, however, of pulpotomy failure in the cases of restoration failure was 3.7 (95% CI 0.8-15.5) times higher than in cases of intact restorations. Earlier reports have shown that restoring pulpotomised primary molars with resin-based materials or amalgam is inferior to the reported success rates when using stainless steel crowns; however, restoration failure did not influence treatment prognosis significantly [32,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that pulpotomy success rate for teeth restored with a stainless steel crown was higher than for those restored with amalgam [ 105 ].…”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%