2020
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2018.00514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful ankle replantation in two cases with different presentations

Abstract: We report our experience of treating two patients with ankle amputation with different presentations. The first case was a clean-cut sharp amputation. The second case was an avulsion injury following a motor vehicle accident in a patient who arrived 8 hours after the injury. Replantation was successful in both cases. In avulsion injuries, a secondary operation for wound coverage is required at a later stage. With good strategy and a support team, encouraging limb survival outcomes are possible post-replantatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The arguments for completing the amputation included the securing of hemostasis in a shocked patient, conducting a shorter procedure, and eliminating the risk of crush syndrome or a reperfusion injury associated with limb salvage (9). The unavailability of vascular reconstruction (10) for such extremity injuries in most Ghanaian centers casts doubt about the future viability of a replanted mangled extremity, which was a valid consideration in our patient since the blood supply in the ankle area had less elaborate collaterals compared to the other large joints. The damage to the dorsalis pedis and the uncertain preservation of the posterior tibial artery further diminished the chances of extremity viability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The arguments for completing the amputation included the securing of hemostasis in a shocked patient, conducting a shorter procedure, and eliminating the risk of crush syndrome or a reperfusion injury associated with limb salvage (9). The unavailability of vascular reconstruction (10) for such extremity injuries in most Ghanaian centers casts doubt about the future viability of a replanted mangled extremity, which was a valid consideration in our patient since the blood supply in the ankle area had less elaborate collaterals compared to the other large joints. The damage to the dorsalis pedis and the uncertain preservation of the posterior tibial artery further diminished the chances of extremity viability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…With regard to TB1, we infer that the Late Pleistocene 'surgeon(s)' who amputated this individual's lower left leg must have possessed detailed knowledge of limb anatomy and muscular and vascular systems to prevent fatal blood loss and infection. They must also have understood the necessity to remove the limb for survival 29 . Finally, during surgery, the surrounding tissue including veins, vessels and nerves, were exposed and negotiated in such a way that allowed this individual to not only survive but also continue living with altered mobility.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, during surgery, the surrounding tissue including veins, vessels and nerves, were exposed and negotiated in such a way that allowed this individual to not only survive but also continue living with altered mobility. Intensive post-operative nursing and care would have been vital, such as temperature regulation, regular feeding, bathing, and movement to prevent bed sores while the individual was immobile 29 . The wound would have been regularly cleaned, dressed, and disinfected, perhaps using locally available botanical resources with medicinal properties to prevent infection and provide anaesthetics for pain relief 30,31 .…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%