SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization &Amp; Simulation Conference 2009
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.170.spe125399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful Application of 3-D Seismic Technology on Middle Cretaceous Carbonate Reservoir—Significant OIP Increasing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The static models were constructed by extrapolating well log data across reservoir. The recent advance technologies such as 3D deconvolution and Radon demultiple were used to interpret faults, fracture, structure, HKS/dolomite mapping and rock typing (Sultan et al 2005;Al Shateri et al 2009;Yamamoto et al 2012;Miyamoto et al 2017). Reservoir facies, matrix permeability, initial water saturation were populated using sequential indicator simulation, sequential Gaussian simulation with co-kriggged with acoustic impedance and saturation height function derived from capillary pressure, respectively (Bushara et al 1997;Venkitadri et al 2005;Ghedan et al 2006;Al-Suwaidi et al, 2010;Bachar et al 2011;Al-ameri et al 2011;Voleti et al 2014).…”
Section: Reservoir and Simulation Models Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static models were constructed by extrapolating well log data across reservoir. The recent advance technologies such as 3D deconvolution and Radon demultiple were used to interpret faults, fracture, structure, HKS/dolomite mapping and rock typing (Sultan et al 2005;Al Shateri et al 2009;Yamamoto et al 2012;Miyamoto et al 2017). Reservoir facies, matrix permeability, initial water saturation were populated using sequential indicator simulation, sequential Gaussian simulation with co-kriggged with acoustic impedance and saturation height function derived from capillary pressure, respectively (Bushara et al 1997;Venkitadri et al 2005;Ghedan et al 2006;Al-Suwaidi et al, 2010;Bachar et al 2011;Al-ameri et al 2011;Voleti et al 2014).…”
Section: Reservoir and Simulation Models Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%