Successful Application of a Robust Link to Automatically Optimise Reservoir
Management of a Real Field

Alkhelaiwi, Faisal; Davies, David; Tesaker, Oeystein; Straub, Richard E.; Barrett, Richard

doi:10.2523/107171-ms

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The main task of the coupling tool is to transfer the full Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR) of each connection from the reservoir simulation to its counterpart in the network modelling software and to return the specified value of the controlling parameter for each connection to the reservoir simulator in an automated process 35 . Experience has shown that it is better to use the pressure as the control parameter rather than liquid flow rate since the latter tends to produce oscillations in the results.…”

Section: 3mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Inflow Control Devices: Application and Value Quantification of a Developing Technology

Alkhelaiwi¹,

Davies²

2007

Proceedings of International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractHorizontal and multilateral completions are a proven, superior development option compared to conventional solutions in many reservoir situations. However, they are still susceptible to coning toward the heel of the well despite their maximizing of reservoir contact. This is due to frictional pressure drop and/or permeability variations along the well. Annular flow, leading to severe erosion "hot-spots" and plugging of screens is another challenge. Inflow Control Devices (ICDs) were proposed as a solution to these difficulties in the early '90s. ICDs have recently gained popularity and are being increasingly applied to a wider range of field types. Their efficacy to control the well inflow profile has been confirmed by a variety of field monitoring techniques. An ICD is a choking device installed as part of the sandface completion hardware. It aims to balance the horizontal well's inflow profile and minimize the annular flow at the cost of a limited, extra pressure drop. Fractured and more heterogeneous formations require, in addition, the installation of annular isolation. The new technologies of Swell Packers and Constrictors can provide this annular isolation in an operationally simple manner. This paper describes the history of ICD development with an emphasis on the designs available and their areas of application. These technical criteria will be illustrated using published field examples. The ICD's flexibility will be shown by its integration with other conventional and advanced production technologies e.g. Stand-Alone-Screens, annular isolation, artificial lift, gravel packs and intelligent completions in both horizontal and multilateral wells. It will be shown how the value of such well-construction options can be quantified using commercially available, modelling simulators. Simple, but reliable, guidelines on how to model the performance of ICDs over the well's life will be provided. This technique can thus be used as part of the value quantification process for both the evaluation of completion options and for their detailed design.

show abstract

Section: 3mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…ICV operation can be optimised to maximise recovery after unwanted fluid breakthrough occurs using a commercially available optimizer 35 . N.B.…”

Section: Integration Of Icds With Inflow Control Valves (Icvs)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Inflow Control Devices: Application and Value Quantification of a Developing Technology

Alkhelaiwi¹,

Davies²

2007

Proceedings of International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Inflow Control Devices: Application and Value Quantification of a Developing Technology

Al-Khelaiwi

Davies²

2007

International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Horizontal and multilateral completions are a proven, superior development option compared to conventional solutions in many reservoir situations. However, they are still susceptible to coning toward the heel of the well despite their maximizing of reservoir contact. This is due to frictional pressure drop and/or permeability variations along the well. Annular flow, leading to severe erosion "hot-spots" and plugging of screens is another challenge. Inflow Control Devices (ICDs) were proposed as a solution to these difficulties in the early '90s. ICDs have recently gained popularity and are being increasingly applied to a wider range of field types. Their efficacy to control the well inflow profile has been confirmed by a variety of field monitoring techniques. An ICD is a choking device installed as part of the sandface completion hardware. It aims to balance the horizontal well's inflow profile and minimize the annular flow at the cost of a limited, extra pressure drop. Fractured and more heterogeneous formations require, in addition, the installation of annular isolation. The new technologies of Swell Packers and Constrictors can provide this annular isolation in an operationally simple manner. This paper describes the history of ICD development with an emphasis on the designs available and their areas of application. These technical criteria will be illustrated using published field examples. The ICD's flexibility will be shown by its integration with other conventional and advanced production technologies e.g. Stand-Alone-Screens, annular isolation, artificial lift, gravel packs and intelligent completions in both horizontal and multilateral wells. It will be shown how the value of such well-construction options can be quantified using commercially available, modelling simulators. Simple, but reliable, guidelines on how to model the performance of ICDs over the well's life will be provided. This technique can thus be used as part of the value quantification process for both the evaluation of completion options and for their detailed design. 1 Introduction Horizontal and multilateral wells are becoming a basic well architecture in current field developments. Advances in drilling technology during the past 20 years facilitated the drilling and completion of long (extended reach) horizontal and multilateral wells with the primary objective of maximising the reservoir contact. The increase in reservoir exposure through the extension of well length helped lower the pressure drawdown required to achieve the same rate and enhance the well productivity 1–2. Major operators have proved the advantages of such wells in improving recovery and lowering the cost per unit length. The production from thin oil column reservoirs (e.g. The Norwegian Troll Field) became a reality thanks to such wells 3–4. However, the increase in wellbore length and exposure to different reservoir facies came at a cost. Frictional pressure drop caused by fluid flow in horizontal sections resulted in higher drawdown-pressure in the heel section of the completion, causing an unbalanced fluid influx. Hence, coning of water and gas toward the heel of the well was observed. Variable distribution of permeability along the wellbore also results in variation of the fluid influx along the completion and an uneven sweep of the reservoir. Annular flow is another challenge often encountered when horizontal wellbores are completed with Stand-Alone-Screens (SAS) or with pre-perforated/Slotted liners. Neither of these completion options employs any form of isolation between the casing and the formation (i.e. external casing packers). Annular flow, which is dependent on many parameters such as the size of the clearance between the sandface and the liner (screen) outer diameter, still imposes several problems including: dislodging of the sand grains causing erosion of the sandface, formation of "hot-spots" and plugging of the sand screens 5–6. Previously, the elimination of such phenomenon required the utilization of gravel packs or installation of Expandable Sand Screens (ESS), which often had a significant impact on the well productivity and/or involved a very complex operation 6–7.

show abstract

Impact of Reservoir Uncertainty on Selection of Advanced Completion Type

Birchenko¹,

Demyanov²,

Konopczynski³

et al. 2008

SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Well performance prediction is a key Petroleum Engineering task. However, large discrepancies between Petroleum Engineering models and reality still frequently occur; despite the continuous increase in the complexity and predictive quality of reservoir models. To-day's field development decisions are still made with a high level of uncertainty in the underlying data and its economic impact. The degree of data uncertainty is greatest during the exploration stage, but decreases as the reservoir development plan is executed and production data is obtained. Standard, probabilistic workflows have been developed to quantify this uncertainty. These workflows are usually framed by the reservoir scale development plan and end prior to the well's detailed completion design. This is despite the fact that expensive, advanced completions have become common during recent years and the additional investment in such completions can only be justified if it is shown to be paid-back by improved overall project economics which is subject to a significant level of uncertainty. This paper illustrates the quantification of the long-term benefits of advanced completions using the probabilistic approach. It will be shown how choice of the optimum advanced completion design will reduce the impact of geostatistical uncertainty on the production forecast. Geostatistical realisations of a benchmark reservoir model were generated with a suitable level of data uncertainty. The reservoir was developed by a single horizontal well in a fixed location. The well could be equipped with a variety of completions - an Open Hole with a sand control screen or a perforated pipe, Inflow Control Devices (ICDs) and Interval Control Valves (ICVs). The probabilistic (P10, P50, P90) oil-recovery distribution was then used to identify the optimum completion design. This completion not only achieved the largest recovery, but also showed the least uncertainty in this value. 1. Introduction Well performance prediction is one of the major tasks when preparing an oil or gas field development plan. The complexity and predictive quality of models used to support this activity have increased significantly during the last two decades, partly driven by the ever decreasing cost coupled with the increasing power of computers However, large discrepancies between the model and reality still frequently occur. They stem from:The lack of data (e.g. the unknown distribution of petrophysical properties in reservoir).Deliberate simplifications to make the problem more tractable (e.g. upscaling, black oil PVT models, neglect of thermal effects, etc.).Computational (sub-grid) errors andAn incomplete understanding of the physics and chemistry of the subsurface. Petroleum researchers still work on the more precise description of the laws governing hydrocarbon production (e.g. multiphase flow, relative permeability effects associated with gas condensate flow in porous media, effect of water salinity on oil recovery, etc.). Many E&P development decisions are made under a high level of uncertainty. The degree of uncertainty and its impact on decision making is naturally greatest at the exploration stage of the field development process. This is one reason why a probabilistic analysis is part of reserves estimation and other standard workflows used in making early development decisions. The predictive accuracy of reservoir models should increase as the field development proceeds since the quality and the quantity of reservoir data will continually increase. Reservoir models should be continually updated by field production data, history matching, and the ever increasing number of (logged) reservoir penetrations. However, uncertainty quantification always remains an important task; even during the later, more mature phase of reservoir development.

show abstract

Successful Application of a Robust Link to Automatically Optimise Reservoir Management of a Real Field

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Inflow Control Devices: Application and Value Quantification of a Developing Technology

Inflow Control Devices: Application and Value Quantification of a Developing Technology

Inflow Control Devices: Application and Value Quantification of a Developing Technology

Impact of Reservoir Uncertainty on Selection of Advanced Completion Type

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About