Abstract. In renal clinical trials, both slope-based and timeto-event renal outcomes have been used. These outcomes are typically based on estimates of GFR obtained using creatinine or iothalamate GFR (iGFR). The African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK) was a trial in 1094 African Americans with hypertensive nephrosclerosis, which examined the effects of two levels of BP control and three antihypertensive regimens. This study compared the effects of the AASK interventions on outcomes based on serum creatinine with corresponding outcomes based on iGFR using 9742 matched pairs of iGFR and serum creatinine measurements. The iGFR-based outcomes included (1) a time-to-event composite outcome including a 50% GFR decline, ESRD, or death; (2) a composite outcome including a 50% GFR decline or ESRD; (3) mean decline in GFR in the first 3 mo after randomization (acute slope); (4) mean decline in GFR starting 3 mo after randomization (chronic slope); and (5) mean decline in GFR from baseline (total slope). The corresponding creatininebased outcomes were (1) a composite of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, or death and (2) a composite of doubling of serum creatinine or ESRD and acute, chronic, and total slopes defined by the mean change in estimated GFR (eGFR), where eGFR was estimated from a regression equation for GFR depending primarily on serum creatinine and developed in AASK enrollees. Mean changes in iGFR and eGFR were also compared under extended models that allowed for the possibility that the rate of GFR decline may change over time during the chronic phase. an apparent acceleration in rate of decline of renal function over time was found. Subtle differences were observed between effects of the interventions on some of the creatinine and iGFR slope-based outcomes, but the main conclusions of the trial were similar for the serum creatinine and iothalamatebased measurements. This has important implications for the design of clinical trials with renal outcomes.Choosing appropriate outcomes is critical to the success of clinical trials. In renal clinical trials to date, both slope-based and time-to-event renal outcomes have been used (1-5). In the slope-based analysis, GFR is estimated at multiple time points for all participants and curves constructed from these points that reflect the change in renal function over time. In most cases, constant slopes over time are assumed, and mean slopes are compared between the study groups to evaluate the effects of interventions on the rate of GFR decline. In time-to-event analysis, an event such as halving of GFR or ESRD is measured, and the time from randomization to the occurrence of these events is compared between the study groups.Inulin clearance is arguably the gold standard for accurately measuring GFR (6). In large clinical trials, however, 125