2020
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful Identification of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Nasopharyngeal Biopsies Using Deep Learning

Abstract: Pathologic diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) can be challenging since most cases are nonkeratinizing carcinoma with little differentiation and many admixed lymphocytes. Our aim was to evaluate the possibility to identify NPC in nasopharyngeal biopsies using deep learning. A total of 726 nasopharyngeal biopsies were included. Among them, 100 cases were randomly selected as the testing set, 20 cases as the validation set, and all other 606 cases as the training set. All three datasets had equal numbers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Training cancer classifiers without detailed annotations alleviates the burden of experts and allows DNN models to benefit from numerous WSIs with readily available sign-out diagnoses. In previous studies, methods for detecting cancer using strongly supervised models trained with patch-wise annotations 11 – 19 still outperformed weakly supervised models. However, research on weakly supervised models for cancer detection is gaining popularity because annotation is too costly and because models trained through strong supervision are limited by how targets are annotated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Training cancer classifiers without detailed annotations alleviates the burden of experts and allows DNN models to benefit from numerous WSIs with readily available sign-out diagnoses. In previous studies, methods for detecting cancer using strongly supervised models trained with patch-wise annotations 11 – 19 still outperformed weakly supervised models. However, research on weakly supervised models for cancer detection is gaining popularity because annotation is too costly and because models trained through strong supervision are limited by how targets are annotated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Restricted by computing limitations, most histopathology studies have used a two-stage patch-based workflow: a patch-level CNN is trained using patches cropped from a WSI, followed by a slide-level algorithm being trained on features extracted by the patch-level model to reveal the final diagnosis. These patch-based methods have yielded successful results in cancer identification 11 – 19 , cancer type classification 14 , 20 , cancer metastasis detection 13 , 16 18 , and prognosis analysis 21 , 22 . However, such methods require experienced pathologists to perform substantial annotation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training cancer classifiers without detailed annotations alleviates the burden of annotation from experts, and allows deep neural network models to benefit from a huge amount of raw slide data with clinical diagnoses. Compared to previous works, methods on detecting cancers with strong supervision models by patch-wise annotations [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] still outperformed weak supervision models. However, research on weak supervision models for cancer detecting is gradually increasing since the model trained in a strong supervision manner is limited by how targets are annotated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restricted by computing limitations, most histopathology studies used a two-stage patch-based workflow: a patch-level CNNs training using patches cropped from WSI, followed by a slide-level algorithm trained on features extracted by the patch-level model, to learn the final diagnosis. These patch-based methods have yielded successful results such as cancer identification [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] , cancer types classification 14,20 , cancer metastasis 13,[16][17][18] and prognosis analysis [21][22] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, from our review, there is no study that attempted to develop end-to-end DLR models for predicting the prognoses of NPC patients from PET/CT images. In addition, existing DLR studies [27][28][29][30][32][33][34] are further limited by: (1) they were mainly designed for single imaging modality such as MRI and CT, so their DLR models cannot derive complementary features from multi-modality PET/CT images; and (2) they had limited comparison to the CR methods (e.g., only a few CR methods were chosen for comparison), which undermines the reliability of their conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%