Abstract:A radicular variant of dens invaginatus (DI) is a rare form of dens invaginatus which develops in the root of the tooth after the crown development is completed. This report involves successful management of a case with guided tissue regeneration and describes the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) characteristics of true radicular DI. A 20-year-old woman reported with recurrent swelling and pus discharge associated with her maxillary left central incisor (#21). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the re… Show more
“…• diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for dens in dente in form of case report with or without associated literature review [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,35,36, 37] -18 articles;…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, platelet-rich brin has been used as apical barrier during Oehlers Type II dens invaginatus treatment, while root canal was lled with Biodentine after invaginated hard tissue mass removal [27]. Mohan et al expand such protocol by adding freeze-dried demineralized bone graft to ll bone defect at the periapical area of tooth with radicular dens invaginatus associated complications [28].…”
Background. Dens in dente represents developmental anomaly of tooth structure, characterized with different depth of invagination lined with either enamel or cementum, and associated with different clinical and roentgenological features.
Objective. To methodize available treatment options for dens invaginatus in systematic manner and analyze suitability of such for different clinical scenarios.
Materials and Methods. Aggregation of data regarding treatment options for dens invaginatus cases was provided through literature search within Pubmed Central and PubMed databases. Literature review was provided in accordance to the available guidelines.
Results. Provided literature review helped to establish four main strategies of treating teeth with present dens invaginatus anomaly:1) preventive treatment (with no endodontic intervention);2) preventive treatment (with endodontic intervention only in invaginated canal);3) treatment of dens invaginatus-associated complications (with endodontic treatment of original and invaginated canals);4) complex treatment of dens invaginatus-associated complications, which includes not only root canal treatment, but also periodontal treatment and other potential treatment options, such as extraction.
Conclusion. Dens invaginatus represents several clinical challenges during the treatment related with type of structural anomaly due to the Oehlers classiŢcation, variability of its conŢguration, depth of invagination and its localization within coronal or root portion of tooth, proximity to the pulp and pretreatment pulp and periodontium vitality conditions, while also with periapical status in means of apex size and thickness of root residual walls.
“…• diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for dens in dente in form of case report with or without associated literature review [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,35,36, 37] -18 articles;…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, platelet-rich brin has been used as apical barrier during Oehlers Type II dens invaginatus treatment, while root canal was lled with Biodentine after invaginated hard tissue mass removal [27]. Mohan et al expand such protocol by adding freeze-dried demineralized bone graft to ll bone defect at the periapical area of tooth with radicular dens invaginatus associated complications [28].…”
Background. Dens in dente represents developmental anomaly of tooth structure, characterized with different depth of invagination lined with either enamel or cementum, and associated with different clinical and roentgenological features.
Objective. To methodize available treatment options for dens invaginatus in systematic manner and analyze suitability of such for different clinical scenarios.
Materials and Methods. Aggregation of data regarding treatment options for dens invaginatus cases was provided through literature search within Pubmed Central and PubMed databases. Literature review was provided in accordance to the available guidelines.
Results. Provided literature review helped to establish four main strategies of treating teeth with present dens invaginatus anomaly:1) preventive treatment (with no endodontic intervention);2) preventive treatment (with endodontic intervention only in invaginated canal);3) treatment of dens invaginatus-associated complications (with endodontic treatment of original and invaginated canals);4) complex treatment of dens invaginatus-associated complications, which includes not only root canal treatment, but also periodontal treatment and other potential treatment options, such as extraction.
Conclusion. Dens invaginatus represents several clinical challenges during the treatment related with type of structural anomaly due to the Oehlers classiŢcation, variability of its conŢguration, depth of invagination and its localization within coronal or root portion of tooth, proximity to the pulp and pretreatment pulp and periodontium vitality conditions, while also with periapical status in means of apex size and thickness of root residual walls.
Dens invaginatus (DI) is a tooth abnormality first described by Socrates in 1856 (Hulsmann, 1997). The etiology of this malformation remains unknown, and it resulted in an invagination of the enamel organ into the dental papilla before mineralization of the tooth structure (Nosrat & Schneider, 2015). It will cause the weakness of enamel , which can easily lead to pulp infection. The clinical symptoms of DI may not be typical, by analyzing the incidence of DI in the population can alert the clinicians of the existence of this kind of teeth malformation and help improve the early diagnosis rate of DI.The prevalence of DI is 0.25%-10% in the general population . The variation in the prevalence may be caused by the different cohorts studied, identification criteria used, and diagnostic difficulties . Invaginated teeth were usually presented as case reports in the literature. There are a limited number of studies reporting the prevalence of DI, in which
“…Dens invaginatus (DI) is a developmental anomaly resulting from an invagination of the enamel organ into the dental papilla prior to the mineralization phase. [1] Maxillary lateral incisors are the most commonly affected teeth, [2] followed by maxillary central incisors, premolars, canines, and less often molars. [3] Prevalence of DI varies depending on the invagination type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type I is the most common, reaching a prevalence of 11.3%, while types II and III are uncommon, accounting for 0.7% and 0.8% of cases, respectively, [4] with a 3:1 female predilection. [1] The purpose of this paper was to detail the management of type II dens invaginatus in an immature necrotic permanent tooth using the revascularization approach with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as a scaffold material, and to discuss the clinical and radiological outcomes of this technique.…”
Dens invaginatus (DI) is an unusual tooth anomaly, resulting from an infolding of the dental papilla during tooth development. Root canal treatment of such teeth is challenging because of the difficulties associated with this type of malformation.The purpose of this paper was to describe the management of Oehlers type II DI in an immature upper right canine associated with a latero-apical lesion and a sinus tract and to demonstrate that cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and operator dental microscope are essential auxiliaries that help in avoiding errors in the diagnosis and treatment of such teeth.We also aimed to highlight a novel method of regenerative endodontic treatment (RET) for immature necrotic teeth using Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), a recently developed scaffold material, to overcome limitations associated with traditional endodontic treatment using an apical plug.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.