Successful Recruitment to Qualitative Research: A Critical Reflection

Abstract

Recruitment to qualitative research is an important methodological consideration. However, the process of recruitment is under-communicated in qualitative research articles and methods textbooks. A robust recruitment plan enhances trustworthiness and overall research success. Although recruitment has recently received increased attention in the qualitative methodology literature, a more nuanced understanding is required. We realized successful recruitment to our focused ethnographic inquiry. Numerous nurse educators, researchers, and administrators volunteered within three months of study initiation. Using Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle, we conducted a critical reflection on the recruitment log and participant interview data to surface factors contributing to our success. This article offers our insights into the facilitators of successful recruitment. Our reflection revealed four themes contributing to successful enrollment: (a) laying the groundwork, (b) recruitment plan, (c) building rapport, and (d) participant motivations. Two new recruitment strategies accounted for over 60% of our sample. Reporting on successful strategies for recruiting participants to qualitative research and specifying participants’ motivations to volunteer, from their perspective, make important contributions to the recruitment literature. Our article offers guidance to qualitative researchers pursuing successful recruitment. Additional research is required to evaluate the relative influence of various recruitment strategies.

Patients’ perioperative experiences of an opioid-free versus opioid-based care pathway for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A qualitative study

“…Nevertheless, all the enrolled study participants who attended the 3-month follow-up in the randomized controlled trial and were invited to participate in this interview study willingly agreed to do so. The successful recruitment of participants to this interview study was likely due to the study population being familiar with the researchers from previous encounters within the clinical trial, and their presumable interest in the research topic ( Negrin et al, 2022 ). However, it is important to acknowledge that participants’ familiarity with the researchers may introduce potential participant bias, including social desirability bias.…”

Feeling worried and powerless: A qualitative interview study of relatives’ experiences of the collaboration with patients and nurses during COVID-19 visiting restrictions in Denmark

“…Furthermore, individuals may choose to volunteer based on their interest in the topic in question, it is relevant and important, and feeling they have important insights to contribute. 34,35 Several of these aspects may have been strengthened by the research topic being related to the consequences of the COVID-19 visiting restrictions policies, and the study taking place during the first wave of the pandemic. Many people were affected by the situation and may have been motivated to volunteer, seeking an opportunity to share their experience.…”

The Ethics of Electronic Tracking Devices in Dementia Care: An Interview Study with Developers

“…Informed by convenience sampling, three active strategies were used to purposively recruit from this niche population (Ellard-Gray et al, 2015 ; Negrin et al, 2022 ). The first involved reaching out by email to contact persons at commercial companies and university consortiums based on a list developed from a previous study of commercial ETD company websites (Howes et al, 2022 ), a search of EU and USA funded research projects, and a general internet search.…”