The standard goal in the current management of haemophilia children is the early establishment of prophylaxis using recombinant factor VIII or IX (FVIII/IX) agents. The development of inhibitors neutralizing the clotting factor activity is the most challenging complication associated with the treatment. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is usually applicable for haemophilia patients having low, but not extremely high-titre of FVIII or FIX inhibitor [1]. Bypass therapy using recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa) (NovosevenÒ) or activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) (anti-inhibitor coagulant complex, FEIBA VHÒ) is the only measure to control bleeding in patients with high-titre inhibitors. Recent retrospective studies indicated the safety and efficacy of aPCC or rFVIIa in decreasing the frequency of bleeding episodes in patients with high-titre inhibitors. However, anamnestic response is one of the major obstacles for the introduction of ITI, because it often occurs even after aPCC infusion in patients with haemophilia A or B and each high responding inhibitor. rFVIIa agent does not precipitate anamnesis, although the shorter biological half-life confronts a dilemma for the effective prophylaxis. Thus, the ultimate goal, Ôthe eradication of high responding inhibitor in hemophilia childrenÕ is beyond our scope of practice. We herein report a paediatric case of haemophilia A with high-titre inhibitor who succeeded in ITI until age 20 years following 4 yearsÕ FEIBA prophylaxis.A 19-year-old Japanese boy with haemophilia A was hospitalized because of the left knee joint pain. The patient had a high-titre FVIII inhibitor, and the bleedings were successfully controlled with selfinfusion of FEIBA. The detailed course was reported previously [2]. The diagnosis of haemophilia A was based on a neonatal hepatic bleeding and <1% of FVIII activity. For 7 yearsÕ on-demand therapy with plasma-derived FVIII concentrates (Hemofil-MÒ/Crosseight-MÒ), intracranial bleedings adjacent to a subarachnoid cyst repeated at age 1 and 2 year(s). Thereafter, he showed 127 BU/mL of FVIII inhibitor (Table 1). Despite the on-demand therapy with Proplex-STÒ, he frequently bled into the target joints. At age 10 years, 1 BU/mL of the inhibitor level elevated to 989 BU/mL after high-dose Crosseight-M therapy for the third intracranial haemorrhage. During the consequent regular infusions of Proplex (50 U/kg/day, tri-weekly), joint and mucosal bleedings recurred. An accidental quadriceps bleeding and shock at 14 years of age prompted FEIBA prophylaxis (50 U/kg/day, tri-weekly), that led to a successful school life followed by a professional life of care-worker in hospital. He was on dietary therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus since age 15 years. No adverse events occurred during the self-FEIBA infusion without the use of central venous access devices.At age 19 years, he visited our emergency room because of the left knee injury resulting from an accidental fall from stairs on collision with passengers at the station. On admission, he complaine...