Although red blood cell (RBC) exchange (RBCX) is the primary apheresis modality for acute sickle cell disease (SCD) complications, it may not be sufficient in managing selected patients with severe presentation. 1,2 Despite RBCX, the condition of patients with acute, severe SCD presentation may continue to deteriorate. [3][4][5][6] Despite receiving RBCX, up to 21% of patients with fat embolism syndrome (FES) and 22% of patients with severe intrahepatic cholestasis experience mortality. 3,6 Despite RBCX, patients may also develop life-threatening complications of hepatopathy, acute kidney injury (AKI), or multiorgan failure (MOF). 3,[7][8][9][10][11] Although RBCX removes sickled RBCs, progression of SCD-related complications may occur due to oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines, and accumulation of acute phase proteins. 1,7,[12][13][14][15] Therefore, in selected patients with acute SCD complications, RBCX alone may not be enough. 1,2 In patients with continued deterioration despite RBCX, some case reports demonstrate improvement with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). In patients with SCD, TPE may provide benefits by removing inflammatory cytokines and plasma-based acute phase