2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2017.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful use of dabrafenib after the occurrence of drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) induced by vemurafenib

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to what was suggested in both articles by Pinard et al 1 and Tahsen et al, 2 this case implies that the hypersensitivity reaction can be class specific rather than drug specific. Even if few cases noting the successful use of dabrafenib after vemurafenib-induced SCAR have been reported,1, 2, 4 the reintroduction cannot be alleged as safe and should be considered with care. In practice we do not suggest the avoidance dabrafenib after vemurafenib SCARs, but we emphasize that this introduction should take place within a hospitalized setting.…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to what was suggested in both articles by Pinard et al 1 and Tahsen et al, 2 this case implies that the hypersensitivity reaction can be class specific rather than drug specific. Even if few cases noting the successful use of dabrafenib after vemurafenib-induced SCAR have been reported,1, 2, 4 the reintroduction cannot be alleged as safe and should be considered with care. In practice we do not suggest the avoidance dabrafenib after vemurafenib SCARs, but we emphasize that this introduction should take place within a hospitalized setting.…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%
“…To the Editor: We read with interest the recent case report by Pinard et al 1 about the successful introduction of dabrafenib after DRESS (drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) induced by vemurafenib and more recently the same successful experience of Tahseen et al 2 after vemurafenib-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis. However, from our own practice, we would caution that these experiences should not be extended to all patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7 For those who do not respond to immune checkpoint blockade therapy, it is equivalent to a death sentence because of the extremely severe course of metastatic malignant melanoma after vemurafenib withdrawal. 21 The successful use of dabrafenib in case of vemurafenibinduced severe AEs have been reported. 7 22-24 For a safe switch to dabrafenib, complete remission of vemurafenibrelated toxicity symptoms is required.…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dabrafenib was reported twice ( n = 2; 3%) as the causative drug of two DRESS cases (one after switching from a vemurafenib‐DRESS‐induced case) 20,21 . All the remainder ( n = 30; 98%) were caused by vemurafenib, which was related with melanoma in all of the cases 12–14,16,20–33 . A total of 64.5% ( n = 20) cases were related to the combination of vemurafenib and cobimetinib; 20,22,27–29 however, when an actual assessment of the culprit drug was performed (Naranjo scale, ALDEN score, patch test and/or in vitro analysis of lymphocyte reactivity), vemurafenib was the solo cause of the SCAR 15,25,27 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixteen cases (51.6%) were treated with systemic corticosteroids 12,16,20,21,24–26,28,29,32,33 . Dabrafenib was a common‐used therapy after vemurafenib‐induced SCAR ( n = 16; 51.7%), 15,20–22,24–27,29,31 and no other SCAR was subsequently reported except in one case 21 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%