2013
DOI: 10.1177/0961463x10380023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Succession planning and temporality: The influence of the past and the future

Abstract: Although succession planning has been a fertile topic of investigation among rural sociologists, its temporal elements have been neglected. This has resulted in static analyses, with little attention paid to the influences of the past and future on present decision-making. This article introduces a consideration of temporality, examining the influences of past and future on the development and expression of farming identities. I argue that temporality plays a critical role as farmers struggle with conflicting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…to accept it as an element of his own self.” While Kuehne's experiences () illustrate the significance of differential socialization, it also highlights the importance of being able to continue the family story: “I felt that having spent all of my life on a farm, and being saturated with the farming culture from parents and friends from an early age, as well as being the fifth generation of an unbroken line of farmers, I had little choice but to continue the farming tradition” (204). Gill () notes how the importance of temporal elements in understanding farm succession has been neglected in academic discussion. Her understanding of individuals as merely “placeholders in the passage of time” (85) is useful in understanding the influence of the farm family in succession decision making.…”
Section: Societal Change and The Family Farmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…to accept it as an element of his own self.” While Kuehne's experiences () illustrate the significance of differential socialization, it also highlights the importance of being able to continue the family story: “I felt that having spent all of my life on a farm, and being saturated with the farming culture from parents and friends from an early age, as well as being the fifth generation of an unbroken line of farmers, I had little choice but to continue the farming tradition” (204). Gill () notes how the importance of temporal elements in understanding farm succession has been neglected in academic discussion. Her understanding of individuals as merely “placeholders in the passage of time” (85) is useful in understanding the influence of the farm family in succession decision making.…”
Section: Societal Change and The Family Farmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It typically, but not always, involves the transfer of ownership. It has long been understood to be intricately rooted in both tradition and a commitment to the family collective (de Haan 1994;Gasson and Errington 1993;Gill 2013). In addition to being the subject of significant research in the more general family business literature (see for example Handler [1994], who provides a rigorous review of family business succession research), it is increasingly identified in the agricultural sociology literature as an important process, shaping the industry structure and occupancy of the land.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are manifold general conceptualizations of time and temporality; however, for the purposes of this article, we conceptualize time with the help of G. H. Mead (Flaherty and Fine, 2001; Gill, 2013; Jones et al, 2017; Nilsen, 2019a) and his philosophy of the present (Mead, 1932) in combination with the work of Bourdieu (2000, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of longer-term scenarios, the aspect of rural life which has perhaps most preoccupied researchers is tenure and the continuity of households (e.g. Smith 1997), which is indeed a major concern of contemporary farming families revealed in sociological studies (Gill 2013). The evidence for routines, risk aversion and actively maintained continuity—and therefore a perhaps limited reach and breadth of futurity—is certainly readily detectible on the Romano-British farmsteads in the upper Thames valley.…”
Section: Making and Breaking Routines In The Upper Thames Valleymentioning
confidence: 99%