Ecology and Coal Resource Development 1979
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4832-8365-4.50077-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successional Development of Vegetation on Surface Mined Land in Montana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural plant succession and minesoil development on unreclaimed areas after disturbance have been reported in Minnesota (Leisman 1957), Wisconsin (Kimmerer 1984), ~ontana (Schafer et al 1980, Schafer and Nielsen 1979, Sindelar 1979, Iowa (Glen-Lewin 1979), Illinois (Croxton 1928), Indiana (Byrnes and Hiller 1973), Ohio (Bell and Ungar 1981), Pennsylvania (Bramble andAshley 1955, Brenner et al, 1984), West Virginia (Smith et al 1971), Kentucky (Thompson et al 1984), Missouri (Game et al 1982), and Oklahoma (Gibson et al 1985, Johnson· et al 1982. Most of these studies have attempted to evaluate the plant species and communities that established and developed on the disturbed area, and to· assess the influence of soil properties on plant community development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural plant succession and minesoil development on unreclaimed areas after disturbance have been reported in Minnesota (Leisman 1957), Wisconsin (Kimmerer 1984), ~ontana (Schafer et al 1980, Schafer and Nielsen 1979, Sindelar 1979, Iowa (Glen-Lewin 1979), Illinois (Croxton 1928), Indiana (Byrnes and Hiller 1973), Ohio (Bell and Ungar 1981), Pennsylvania (Bramble andAshley 1955, Brenner et al, 1984), West Virginia (Smith et al 1971), Kentucky (Thompson et al 1984), Missouri (Game et al 1982), and Oklahoma (Gibson et al 1985, Johnson· et al 1982. Most of these studies have attempted to evaluate the plant species and communities that established and developed on the disturbed area, and to· assess the influence of soil properties on plant community development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that an increasing trend toward a monoculture of timothy may increase the total amount of energy and nutrients bound in the recalcitrant fraction of litter, decreasing the available soil nutrient pool, slowing the decomposition rate, and increasing litter accumulation, which will ultimately affect total plant production. As previously stated, decreases in stand productivity, excessive litter accumulation, and rapid depletion of soil nutrient pools have been documented in several studies of mine spoil reclaimed as pasture (Carrel et al 1979;Sindelar 1979;Schafer and Nielsen 1979;Marrs et al 1980;Schafer et al 1980;Stroo and Jencks 1982). Because timothy has low nutrient requirements and is tolerant of low soil fertility (Smoliak et al 1981), the presence of this short-lived perennial at high biomass levels with a relatively small total plant biomass on the 7-year plot along with a relatively slow timothy litter decomposition rate, augment the suggestion that spoil on the oldest plot is deficient in available nutrients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It has been hypothesized that the rapid growth and slow decomposition of these types of forage can preclude colonization of disturbed sites by native species, affecting not only stand community structure, but decomposition and nutrient cycling processes as well (Visser 1984). Decreases in stand productivity, excessive litter accumulation, and rapid depletion of soil nutrient pools have been documented in several studies of mine spoil reclaimed as pasture (Carrel et al 1979;Sindelar 1979;Schafer and Nielsen 1979;Marrs et al 1980;Schafer et al 1980;Stroo and Jencks 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Sindelar (1979) found that vegetation established on abandoned surface mined land in southeastern Montana almost 50 years previously varied from site to site. Two sites with a sandy loam spoil differed in that one was dominated by Artemisia cana (Silver Sagebrush), A. dracunculus (False Tarragon Sagewort) and Bromus tectorum (Cheatgrass), with only 7% cover by perennial grasses, while the second showed almost 50% cover by perennial grasses.…”
Section: Colonization Of Treated Industrial Wastes and Contaminated Smentioning
confidence: 99%