2021
DOI: 10.1093/biolinnean/blab157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successive matings affect copulatory courtship but not sperm transfer in a spider model

Abstract: Previous studies have reported that males augment their reproductive success by increasing the number of females with which they copulate, and that such copulations are not energetically demanding in terms of trivial sperm production costs. However, we now know that males do pay reproductive costs. As males mate successively, a reduction in the performance of copulatory behaviours would be expected, as well as in the number of sperm transferred. Here we compared the duration of courtship, mating and post-insem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, pholcid spiders show an interesting reproductive biology with different reproductive strategies, many sexual dimorphisms, and a high disparity of genitalic structures including asymmetry, genital polymorphism, and fundamentally different configurations of the female internal genitalia (e.g. [ 2 , 8 15 ]). In contrast to the vast knowledge on the gross morphology of female and male genitalia, the primary male reproductive system is severely understudied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, pholcid spiders show an interesting reproductive biology with different reproductive strategies, many sexual dimorphisms, and a high disparity of genitalic structures including asymmetry, genital polymorphism, and fundamentally different configurations of the female internal genitalia (e.g. [ 2 , 8 15 ]). In contrast to the vast knowledge on the gross morphology of female and male genitalia, the primary male reproductive system is severely understudied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%