1972
DOI: 10.2307/2392150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successor Type and Organizational Change in the Corporate Enterprise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
198
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
198
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They also found that external successions improved firm performance but internal succession did not. Helmich and Brown's (1972) study concluded that larger firms use more external recruiting than smaller firms. On the other hand, Dalton and Kesner's (1983) study claimed the opposite, while Schwartz and Menon (1985) found no relation between the successor origin and firm size.…”
Section: International Small Business Journal 24(5)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They also found that external successions improved firm performance but internal succession did not. Helmich and Brown's (1972) study concluded that larger firms use more external recruiting than smaller firms. On the other hand, Dalton and Kesner's (1983) study claimed the opposite, while Schwartz and Menon (1985) found no relation between the successor origin and firm size.…”
Section: International Small Business Journal 24(5)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The motives of new executives relate to their aspirations for changes in the organization. Early evidence suggests that inside successors are associated with fewer organizational changes (Helmich and Brown 1972) and less strategic change (Wiersema 1992) than outside successors.…”
Section: Executive Succession In Public Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this view, managerial succession has particularly severe effects when an outsider replaces a top executive, because it brings greater organizational and cultural change (Carlson, 1961;Helmich and Brown, 1972). This pattern is likely to be especially strong for the replacement of founders, who likely personify much of the organization's cultural blueprint, critical routines, and operating procedures, which may be lost if not institutionalized before the founder's departure (Carroll, 1984).…”
Section: T Hannan Et Almentioning
confidence: 91%