2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04257.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sucrose phosphorylase of the rumen bacteriumPseudobutyrivibrio ruminisstrain A

Abstract: Aims:  To verify the taxonomic affiliation of bacterium Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens strain A from our collection and to characterize its enzyme(s) responsible for digestion of sucrose. Methods and Results:  Comparison of the 16S rRNA gene of the bacterium with GenBank showed over 99% sequence identity to the species Pseudobutyrivibrio ruminis. Molecular filtration, native electrophoresis on polyacrylamide gel, zymography and thin layer chromatography were used to identify and characterize the relevant enzyme. An… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16S rDNA phylogeny on fewer strains, performed by Kasperowicz et al . [62], showed that the CF1b strain groups closely with the type strain P. ruminis A12-1, which is concurrent with our own 16S rDNA findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16S rDNA phylogeny on fewer strains, performed by Kasperowicz et al . [62], showed that the CF1b strain groups closely with the type strain P. ruminis A12-1, which is concurrent with our own 16S rDNA findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…16S rDNA phylogeny on fewer strains, performed by Kasperowicz et al . [ 62 ], showed that the CF1b strain groups closely with the type strain P. ruminis A12-1, which is concurrent with our own 16S rDNA findings. Whilst 16S rDNA analysis has historically been thought to be a reliable means of establishing distant relationships between organisms [ 63 ], extensive diversity has been found within the 16S rDNA of certain genomes [ 64, 65 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%