Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics 2005
DOI: 10.1201/noe0415390637.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suction anchors for deepwater applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The particle diameters paper were greater than 0.075 mm and less than 1.0 mm, so the gradin The grading curve of quartz sand is shown in Figure 2. The minimum densities of the sand were 1.39 g/cm 3 and 1.66 g/cm 3 , respectively. Th model tests had a relative density of 0.75, that is, the dry density was 1…”
Section: Soil Preparationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The particle diameters paper were greater than 0.075 mm and less than 1.0 mm, so the gradin The grading curve of quartz sand is shown in Figure 2. The minimum densities of the sand were 1.39 g/cm 3 and 1.66 g/cm 3 , respectively. Th model tests had a relative density of 0.75, that is, the dry density was 1…”
Section: Soil Preparationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The grading curve of quartz sand is shown in Figure 2. The minimum and maximum dry densities of the sand were 1.39 g/cm 3 and 1.66 g/cm 3 , respectively. The sand used in the model tests had a relative density of 0.75, that is, the dry density was 1.5 g/cm 3 .…”
Section: Soil Preparationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To obtain the maximum holding capacity, an optimal depth for the attachment point is usually considered in the geotechnical design (DNVGL-RP-303), expressed as either zp,op, optimum depth of 1337 (2024) 012066 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1337/1/012066 2 padeye, or zcl,op, optimal depth of attachment point at centerline (intersection of the loading vector with the centreline of the anchor). In some cases, the attachment point depth was designed below the optimal depth in order to ensure backward rotation at failure to mitigate the potential effect of crack on the capacity of anchors (Andersen et al 2005;Andersen and Jostad, 1999). However, the existence of the offset between the attached depth and optimal depth, denoted as e in Figure 1, results in a moment load (M) at the optimal attachment point in addition to the vertical (V) and horizontal (H) components, which tends to reduce the holding capacity of anchor.…”
Section: Loading Conditions For Current Suction Anchorsmentioning
confidence: 99%