2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-020-02239-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suction-fixing surgical device for assisting liver manipulation with laparoscopic forceps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be one of the optimal shapes in material mechanics. Compared with the rigidity gain of 5.48 reported in our previous paper, (6) FEM analysis gave a rigidity gain of 11.3, which is approximately twice as high. The reason might be that irregular stress unbalance and stiffness-sheet distortion, which occur in reality, such as sheet wrinkles, were not considered in the FEM simulation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It may be one of the optimal shapes in material mechanics. Compared with the rigidity gain of 5.48 reported in our previous paper, (6) FEM analysis gave a rigidity gain of 11.3, which is approximately twice as high. The reason might be that irregular stress unbalance and stiffness-sheet distortion, which occur in reality, such as sheet wrinkles, were not considered in the FEM simulation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…As shown in Figs. 6(e) and 6(f), pillar pitch was varied as 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, and 9.0 mm. The pillar occupancy was changed from 10 to 90 in 10% increments.…”
Section: Fem Stress Computation and Optimization Of Beam Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations