“…However, this was the sole index evaluated in this study and was derived from series of ECG R-R intervals employing the 24h Holter monitoring, which methodologically show some restrictions limiting the heart rate variability analysis and interpretation. To this regard, it should be reinforced that there are abundant data supporting the prognostic significance and the role as risk marker of some classical linear and newer non-linear measures of heart variability in different clinical conditions other than Chagas disease [48][49][50][51][52]69,71 . But, several factors influence the prognostic value of heart rate variability measurements when they are used in risk stratification, which among the more important are: a) the type and combination of indexes, b) the nature of the autonomic modulation that the indexes reflect, if overall or parasympathetic or sympathetic exclusive or balanced one, c) the circadian rhythm of heart rate variability, d) the epoch of evaluation during the development of the clinical, functional or pathological condition analysed, e) the severity of left ventricular dysfunction, f) the method employed to achieve, process and editing the ECG R-R intervals series, if derived from 5min short-term recording in controlled experimental setting, or long-term ambulatory 24h Holter recording under uncontrolled interfering factors and non-stationary data series, g) the nature of the selected adverse outcome 50,51,69,71 .…”