1999
DOI: 10.1159/000027908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sudden Deafness

Abstract: In this article the author reviews some of the work done by the Research Group on Sudden Deafness of the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare for the past 26 years. This includes diagnostic criteria, the differential diagnosis, the evaluation of hearing recovery and the efficacy of the treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of the hearing recovery was performed in accordance to the Research Group on Sudden Deafness of the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare [ 13 ] as done in a former study [ 12 ]. Recovery was defined as an average hearing gain of at least 10 dB in five frequencies (250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the hearing recovery was performed in accordance to the Research Group on Sudden Deafness of the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare [ 13 ] as done in a former study [ 12 ]. Recovery was defined as an average hearing gain of at least 10 dB in five frequencies (250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, all have been suggested to be causes of ISHL (42Y44). Kanzaki (45) suggested the association of depletion of NKCA followed by systemic stress with the onset of ISHL. The decrease of NKCA observed in the present study might also be induced by systemic stress in ISHL patients, although GHQ scores did not have a significant correlation with biomarkers.…”
Section: Decreased Nkca and Elevated Neutrophils May Reflect The Systmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pure-tone averages (at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively) at octave or semioctave frequencies under air conduction and 0.25–4 kHz under bone conduction were measured two times per week during treatment and once every 2 weeks after the completion of treatment. The average air-conduction PTAs were obtained through the thresholds at frequencies of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively, following the “Kanzaki criteria” ( Kanzaki, 1999 ; Table 1 ). When the hearing thresholds were undetectable, fixed values were applied for calculations as follows: 110–125–125–125–125 (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively, maximum outputs of our hospital audiometer were 105–115–115–115–115 dB, plus 5, respectively) ( Fontenot et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the hearing thresholds were undetectable, fixed values were applied for calculations as follows: 110–125–125–125–125 (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively, maximum outputs of our hospital audiometer were 105–115–115–115–115 dB, plus 5, respectively) ( Fontenot et al, 2019 ). Hearing gain was classified into four grades according to the PTA gain ( Kanzaki, 1999 ). Accordingly, we classified patients into the recovery (i.e., complete and marked recovery) and no recovery groups (i.e., slight and no recovery).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%