2009
DOI: 10.1215/1089201x-2009-002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sufism and Governmentality in the Late Ottoman Empire

Abstract: 1 7 1 C o m p a r a t i v e S t u d i e s o f S o u t h A s i a , A f r i c a a n d t h e M i d d l e E a s t V o l . 2 9 , N o . 2 , 2 0 0 9 d o i 1 0 .1 2 1 5 / 1 0 8 9 2 0 1 x -2 0 0 9 -0 0 2 © 2 0 0 9 b y D u k e U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s Sufism and Governmentality in theLate Ottoman Empire Brian Silverstein n 1918 a Sufi sheikh in the Ottoman capital found himself filling in blank spaces on a printed questionnaire sent to him, as it was to all other sheikhs in the city. 1 This is what he wrote in resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Мои собеседники упоминают в основном ключевые обители и их филиалы в следующих городах: Скопье (Северная Македония), Призрен, Джакова и Косовска Митровица (Косово). (Silverstein 2009;Clayer, Bougarel 2017: 70-78;95-122;150-158;Glasnik Islamskog Vjerskog Starejšinstva 1962: 186;Popovic 1985). Одни сохранили активность, будучи связанными с официальными религиозными организациями (например, текке братства рифа' ийа в Скопье 6 ), другие -на, своего рода, полулегальном основании, объединившись и создав в 70-х гг.…”
Section: образование и исключениеunclassified
“…Мои собеседники упоминают в основном ключевые обители и их филиалы в следующих городах: Скопье (Северная Македония), Призрен, Джакова и Косовска Митровица (Косово). (Silverstein 2009;Clayer, Bougarel 2017: 70-78;95-122;150-158;Glasnik Islamskog Vjerskog Starejšinstva 1962: 186;Popovic 1985). Одни сохранили активность, будучи связанными с официальными религиозными организациями (например, текке братства рифа' ийа в Скопье 6 ), другие -на, своего рода, полулегальном основании, объединившись и создав в 70-х гг.…”
Section: образование и исключениеunclassified
“…However, tropes of modernization, rationalization, and secularization, analogous to socialist discourses, characterize reformist Islam that has circulated in the region – formerly the Ottoman Empire, subsequently Turkey and the sovereign Balkan states – from the nineteenth century until today (Clayer ; Fortna ). In the nineteenth century, many Ottoman Sufi orders underwent institutional modernization and reforms (Turkish, islah ) that saw an incorporation of contemporary techniques of governmentality, such as bureaucratization, centralization, and new meritocratic assessment of qualifications for a shaykh's post (Silverstein ). Many Ottoman Sufi lodges jettisoned their unconventional, ‘antinomian’, ritual practices (Watenpaugh ), such as drinking saliva to transmit and receive a spiritual blessing (a common practice among the grandparents of my informants, who expressed disgust at the thought), and aligned with more legalistic, scriptural versions of Sunni Islam promoted by Ottoman and Turkish religious institutions and officials (Tsibiridou : 180, 189).…”
Section: Reformist Islammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can therefore be argued that the empire, with its dense networks of interconnected dervish lodges across a vast Ottoman space, was to the peripatetic dervishes as the ocean was to the mobile Hadramis. 5 The late phase of the Ottoman Empire brought about a number of bans and restrictions imposed on dervish brotherhoods mainly as a result of the Tanzimat reforms (Barnes 1992: 38-46;Clayer 2011;Silverstein 2009). The newly formed, secular Turkish state banned all dervish orders in 1925, and this ban officially continues up to the present day.…”
Section: R E C O N N E C T I N G H I S T O R I E S I N T H E P O S T-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The late phase of the Ottoman Empire brought about a number of bans and restrictions imposed on dervish brotherhoods mainly as a result of the Tanzimat reforms (Barnes 1992: 38–46; Clayer 2011; Silverstein 2009). The newly formed, secular Turkish state banned all dervish orders in 1925, and this ban officially continues up to the present day.…”
Section: Reconnecting Histories In the Post-imperial Eramentioning
confidence: 99%