2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10526-010-9337-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sugar feeding by coccinellids under field conditions: the effects of sugar sprays in soybean

Abstract: Sucrose was applied weekly throughout the growing season at three US locations (South Dakota [SD], Maryland [MD], and Kentucky [KY]), and coccinellids and aphids (Aphis glycines Matsumura [Hemiptera: Aphididae]) were sampled 24 h later.Total coccinellid densities were 50-77% greater in sugar-sprayed soybean than in untreated plots. Coccinella septempuncata L., Hippodamia convergens Guérin-Méneville, and Harmonia axyridis Pallas were more abundant where sugar was applied. Coleomegilla maculata (DeGeer) was foun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anthrone assay reacts with sugars (i.e., fructose, glucose, sucrose, trehalose) and glycogen, and the micro-separation can separate a large quantity of sugar from a small amount of glycogen, and vice versa (Van Handel, 1965). These procedures have been adapted for coccinellids (Seagraves et al, 2011), drosophilid flies (Tochen et al, 2016), parasitic wasps (Olson et al, 2000), phorid flies (Fadamiro et al, 2005), and tephritid flies (Yuval et al, 1998). Prior hydration will not affect nutrient readings since they are measured per individual, and not per weight of each individual.…”
Section: Nutrient Bioassaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anthrone assay reacts with sugars (i.e., fructose, glucose, sucrose, trehalose) and glycogen, and the micro-separation can separate a large quantity of sugar from a small amount of glycogen, and vice versa (Van Handel, 1965). These procedures have been adapted for coccinellids (Seagraves et al, 2011), drosophilid flies (Tochen et al, 2016), parasitic wasps (Olson et al, 2000), phorid flies (Fadamiro et al, 2005), and tephritid flies (Yuval et al, 1998). Prior hydration will not affect nutrient readings since they are measured per individual, and not per weight of each individual.…”
Section: Nutrient Bioassaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the provision of flowering plants can enhance the effectiveness of natural enemies by increasing their longevity, fecundity, and predation or parasitism rates (Berndt & Wratten, ; Begum et al., ; Lee & Heimpel, ). Specifically, sugar feeding improves the fitness and performance, and affects the nutrient status in parasitoids (Olson et al., ; Lee et al., ; Chen & Fadamiro, ; Nafziger & Fadamiro, ) and predators (Lundgren & Seagraves, ; Seagraves et al., ). Research has long supported the importance of nectar feeding for parasitoid life histories, but nectar resources for predators have received less attention until recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of pollen and nectar is well studied for hymenopteran parasitoids (e.g., Winkler et al, 2009;Russell, 2015), but increasing attention is being given to the role of non-prey food for predator fitness components such as survival or reproduction, involving studies on coccinellids (Bertolaccini et al, 2008), neuropterans (Resende et al, 2017), predatory mites (Khodayari et al, 2013;Khanamani et al, 2016;Riahi et al, 2017), spiders (Pollard et al, 1995;Nyffeler et al, 2016), and syrphids (van Rijn and Wäckers, 2016). Sugar feeding can improve fitness and performance, as well as nutritional status in coccinellids (Lundgren and Seagraves, 2011;Seagraves et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%