2017
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sugar flux and signaling in plant–microbe interactions

Abstract: Plant breeders have developed crop plants that are resistant to pests, but the continual evolution of pathogens creates the need to iteratively develop new control strategies. Molecular tools have allowed us to gain deep insights into disease responses, allowing for more efficient, rational engineering of crops that are more robust or resistant to a greater number of pathogen variants. Here we describe the roles of SWEET and STP transporters, membrane proteins that mediate transport of sugars across the plasma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
164
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
164
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, all the functionally characterized SWEET family members from different plant species were confirmed to have both sugar efflux and influx activity (Chen et al, 2010(Chen et al, , 2012Lin et al, 2014;Eom et al, 2015). As uniporters, SWEETs transport sugars along a concentration gradient, which raises the question whether MtSWEET1b exports glucose towards the fungus, or whether it imports glucose in competition with the fungus to support the high metabolic activity of arbuscule-containing cells or to avoid defence responses caused by high levels of glucose in the apoplast (Schaarschmidt et al, 2007;Helber et al, 2011;Moore et al, 2015;Bezrutczyk et al, 2018). Several studies indicate that arbuscules-containing cells form a strong sink for hexoses.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, all the functionally characterized SWEET family members from different plant species were confirmed to have both sugar efflux and influx activity (Chen et al, 2010(Chen et al, , 2012Lin et al, 2014;Eom et al, 2015). As uniporters, SWEETs transport sugars along a concentration gradient, which raises the question whether MtSWEET1b exports glucose towards the fungus, or whether it imports glucose in competition with the fungus to support the high metabolic activity of arbuscule-containing cells or to avoid defence responses caused by high levels of glucose in the apoplast (Schaarschmidt et al, 2007;Helber et al, 2011;Moore et al, 2015;Bezrutczyk et al, 2018). Several studies indicate that arbuscules-containing cells form a strong sink for hexoses.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7). It is believed that depletion of carbohydrates enhances plant susceptibility to a pathogen infection (Morkunas and Ratajczak 2014, Bezrutczyk et al 2018, Kanwar and Jha 2018. A decrease in the content of total sugars and reducing sugars in B. juncea during progressive A. brassicae infection (Mathpal et al 2011) and Albugo candida infection (Mishra et al 2009) was reported.…”
Section: Black Spot Disease Influences Brassica Juncea Primary Metabomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of sugars on the expression of genes (including those controlling the growth processes) is often modified by environmental factors, such as changes in the intensity of irradiation or in the access to minerals. The sugars accumulated under drought or cold mainly play the role of osmoregulators and cryoprotectans, but also as a stored source of carbon for later use (when the stress factor ceases to exist); they can also act as regulators modulating plant growth under new conditions [10,12,15,17,18,69]. Soluble sugars (such as, disaccharides, raffinose family oligosaccharides, and fructans) are strongly related to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species under stress conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following strategies were used in order to select the appropriate mutants: (i) if high sugar concentrations in the medium inhibited germination and seedling development, then the seedlings showing development were nonsusceptible to sugars (for example, gin -glucose insensitive, rsr -reduced sugar response, sis -sucrose insensitive, or migmannose insensitive germination); (ii) seeds incapable of germinating (and growing) on media containing sugar concentrations that did not inhibit the development of other plants were mutants that were excessively sensitive to sugars (for example, gss -glucose super sensitive, sss -sucrose super sensitive, or hsr -high sugar-response). During the last decades, a huge progress has been made in understanding the physiological roles of sugar-metabolizing enzymes or sugar transporters, mainly by using transgenic/ mutational approaches [2,9,18,55,56,75,76]. The use of novel mutants (and transgenic plants) that specifically react to different sugars, as well as hormonal mutants, will certainly be helpful in subsequent studies on the regulatory role of sugars throughout plant development and in the elucidation of crosstalk with other signaling pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%