Soeparto, P., Stobo, E. A., and Walker-Smith, J. A. (1972). Archives (Holzel, 1967).The purpose of this paper is to discuss the merits of various methods of chemical examination of the stool used in the clinical diagnosis of sugar malabsorption, and to discuss the types of sugar malabsorption which may be clinically diagnosed. Stools from children suspected of having sugar malabsorption and stools from a small group of control infants have had the pH measured, the content of reducing substances estimated with Clinitest tablets, and any sugars present identified chromatographically. A diagnosis of sugar malabsorption was made on the basis of an assessment of the clinical state, chemical examination of the stools, and response to dietary management. The value of the stool findings in making the clinical diagnosis was assessed. Methods Stool pH estimation. As a preliminary study the reliability of testing stools with pH paper was investigated by comparing readings obtained in this way with those obtained using a glass electrode.Lyphan indicator paper was used (Kloz, Berlin). This paper has a pH range between 1 and 11. A portable pH meter with a glass electrode was used (Model 30C, Electronic Instruments Limited). 35 stools were examined in the ward immediately after they were passed. 9 more stools, freshly passed, were examined as soon as they reached the laboratory, i.e. a total of 44 stools were examined. The stools were collected on plastic to ensure complete collection.The pH of all other stools was routinely tested with pH paper. If the stool was not tested freshly it was frozen and pH estimated after thawing. The interval after the stool was passed varied greatly. The effect of this freezing and variable time interval for measurement was evaluated. The effect of dilution of stools on pH readings was also observed in 17 stools. After testing for pH, all stools were either examined immediately for sugar content or stored in the deepfreeze for later examination.Examination of stools for sugar. A portion of the stool was diluted with twice its volume of water, and homogenized in a Vortex-Genie mixer. 15 drops of this mixture were transferred to a test-tube and a Clinitest tablet (Ames Company) added. The amount of reducing substances present was estimated as described by Kerry and Anderson (1964) and was rated as 56 on 11 May 2018 by guest. Protected by copyright.