2017
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2016.1255898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sugar profile and physicochemical properties of Ethiopian monofloral honey

Abstract: Three hundred twenty honey samples were collected from Ethiopia, and categorized into nine monofloral honeys using melissopalynology. Theses monofloral honeys were investigated for their sugar profile, physicochemical properties, and quality of honeys. Sugars (fructose, glucose, sucrose, maltose, turanose, and isomaltose) were identified using high-performance liquid chromatography and physicochemical properties (moisture, water activity, pH, acidity, ash, minerals, conductivity, colour) using the Harmonized M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
25
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant difference (p<0.05) was observed in moisture content among the honey. This was in line with the report of Belay et al [ 45 ] (20.54 ± 1.28 g/100g). The variation in moisture content between monofloral (Schefflera abyssinica) and polyfloral honey among the sample was due to the nectarous plant variation foraged by bees [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A significant difference (p<0.05) was observed in moisture content among the honey. This was in line with the report of Belay et al [ 45 ] (20.54 ± 1.28 g/100g). The variation in moisture content between monofloral (Schefflera abyssinica) and polyfloral honey among the sample was due to the nectarous plant variation foraged by bees [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the honey samples. The glucose content of Schefflera abyssinica honey of the current study was similar to Nguyen et al [ 54 ] report of New Zealand honey (28.9 ± 2.0 g/100g), Belay et al [ 45 ] (30.55 ± 2.69 g /100g), and Hagr et al [ 55 ] (31.7 ± 0.68 g /100g).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[10] In addition, the colour of CW might also vary depending on the maturity, storage conditions, and botanical origin. [23] Another important parameter for CW intended for commercialization is its volume. Table 2 shows that Y-MATAG yielded the highest volume (435.00 ± 77.91 mL) followed by M-MATAG (391.67 ± 52.98 mL) and Y-PDN (324.83 ± 53.95 mL).…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of Coconut Watermentioning
confidence: 99%