Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and caries experience

Laniado, Nadia; Sanders, Anne E.; Godfrey, Emilie M.; Salazar, Christian R.; Badner, Victor

doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2020.06.018

Cited by 20 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, fortytwo studies were included in the qualitative synthesis (eight cohort, one non-randomised controlled, one case-control and thirty-two cross-sectional studies) and twenty-seven in the meta-analysis (seven cohort, one non-randomised controlled, one case-control and eighteen cross-sectional studies). Among the fifteen studies (27,32,33,36,38,42,43,47,50,51,55,56,58,64,66) excluded from the meta-analysis, all had a cross-sectional design, with one exception (47) .…”

Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 1 presents the main characteristics of forty-two selected studies, in general and according to the type of study and the data analysis (included or not in the meta-analysis). Overall, most studies were conducted in low-middle income countries (26)(27)(28)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)49,51,52,(54)(55)(56)(57)59,60,(62)(63)(64)66,67) and published from 2010 to present (26)(27)(28)(29)32,33,(35)(36)(37)(39)(40)(41)(42)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)…”

Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A prevalence of dental caries > 70 % was found in six studies in general (26,46,51,52,57,67) , four of them were cross-sectional studies included in the meta-analysis (26,46,52,67) . Sugar-sweetened beverages (soft drinks and juices) were the UPF most frequently assessed, overall (26)(27)(28)(29)33,35,(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(61)(62)(63)(65)(66)(67) and in all categories of data analysis. Other nonsweet UPF, such as instant noodles and fast foods, were investigated only in five studies (26,30,35,61,64) , three of them were cross-sectional included in the meta-analysis (26,35,61)…”

Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The risk of bias assessment identified that twenty-seven studies (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)34,36,(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(45)(46)(47)(48)(50)(51)(52)(53)56,61,62,(64)(65)(66) had moderate to high risk (Table 1). Fig.…”

Section: Risk Of Bias In the Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In relation to the thirty-two cross-sectional studies (26,27,29,(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)55,56,58,(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67) , only nine (26,32,33,35,37,44,49,55,58,63,67) were classified as having low risk of bias. The main methodological problems were the evaluation of the UPF without valid and reliable measures (26,29,31,34,36,37,41,44,…”

Section: Risk Of Bias In the Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Ultra-processed food consumption and dental caries in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study summarized the association between ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and dental caries in children and adolescents through a systematic review and meta-analysis. The search of PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases using the “PECOS” strategy retrieved 1,462 eligible articles. Only studies with humans aged ≤ 19 years old; that assessed groups of any UPF or specific UPF items; that measured dental caries as the decayed, filled, and missing surfaces or teeth indexes, based on the World Health Organization criteria; cross-sectional, case-control, cohort and all types of interventions that examined the adjusted association between UPF consumption and dental caries were included. All studies received qualitative evaluation. Meta-analysis using random-effects models combined multivariable-adjusted odd ratio (OR) for case-control and cross-sectional studies and risk ratio (RR) for longitudinal studies of the highest versus lowest category of UPF consumption. Forty-two studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and 27 in the meta-analysis. The pooled RR was 1.71 (95% CI 1.31-2.24), and the pooled OR was 1.55 (95% CI 1.37-1.75). The highest OR was found among participants who had dental caries prevalence >70% (OR=3.67, 95% CI 2.16; 6.23). Better evidence quality was found among cohort studies that evaluated children <6 years old. The findings suggest that higher UPF consumption is associated with greater dental caries in children and adolescents. Public health efforts to reduce UPF consumption are needed to improve the oral health of children and adolescents.

show abstract

Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Risk Of Bias In the Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Risk Of Bias In the Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Ultra-processed food consumption and dental caries in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Global Coverage and Design of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes

Hattersley

Mandeville

2023

JAMA Netw Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ImportanceSugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes are gaining in popularity. The lack of a comprehensive repository of standardized data on SSB taxes and their designs, however, has stymied understanding of current practice in SSB taxes.ObjectiveTo assess the coverage and design of SSB taxes worldwide using the new Global SSB Tax Database.Evidence ReviewSugar-sweetened beverage taxes were collated from existing data sources, hand-searching of peer-reviewed and gray literature, and an internet search. Relevant legislation was identified to verify each tax and extract data on designs.FindingsA total of 118 taxes were verified, including 105 national and 13 subnational taxes. National SSB taxes are in effect in 103 countries and territories, covering 51% of the world’s population. A total of 67% of people living in low-income and 73% in lower-middle–income economies are covered by national SSB taxes, compared with 29% in upper-middle–income and high-income economies. National SSB taxes cover 98% of the population in South Asia compared with only 10% in East Asia and the Pacific. Most SSB taxes are excise taxes (104 of 118 [88%]). Excise taxes in high-income economies are mostly specific (27 of 36 [75%]), whereas ad valorem and mixed taxes are more common in low- and middle-income economies (36 of 66 [55%]). Most specific excise taxes are based on volume only (54 of 59 [92%]), with just 3 jurisdictions applying purely sugar-specific excise taxes. More than half of excise taxes worldwide (55 of 104 [53%]) apply tiered rates, with tiers more commonly defined by beverage type (41 of 55 [75%]) than by sugar content (18 of 55 [33%]). Tiers defined by sugar content are mainly used in high-income countries (13 of 18 [72%]) and Europe and Central Asia (10 of 18 [56%]). Almost one-third of excise taxes worldwide (30 of 104 [29%]) and almost half of excise taxes in low- and middle-income economies (28 of 66 [42%]) apply to unsweetened bottled water.Conclusions and RelevanceThis study provides a comprehensive review of global coverage and design of SSB taxes. Sugar-sweetened beverage tax coverage is higher than previously reported, with clear differences in designs between regions and income groups. These findings can inform a more empirically grounded approach to SSB tax guidance.

show abstract

Dietary sugar intake: Public health perspective

Margină

Ungurianu²

2024

Encyclopedia of Toxicology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and caries experience

Cited by 20 publications

References 19 publications

Ultra-processed food consumption and dental caries in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ultra-processed food consumption and dental caries in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Global Coverage and Design of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes

Dietary sugar intake: Public health perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About