2016
DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2016025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suggestions for diatom-based monitoring in intermittent streams

Abstract: -Over the last decades, river lentification processes and droughts have been dramatically spreading worldwide, due to global and local drastic changes due to human activities. Under this scenario, the evaluation of physical disturbance caused by intermittency and droughts has become more and more relevant. In this research, we compare samples collected in Mediterranean streams following both traditional and experimental approaches with the aim of understanding if diatom indices calculated from a new sampling s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…priority effects) or individual spillover from upstream populations (i.e. mass effect), the analysis of the functional profile of diatom communities supports the role of dispersal limitation because the motile guild is dominant in impacted sites, which has been observed to be associated with both hydrological (Elias et al 2015;Falasco et al 2016) and morphological (Smucker and Vis, 2010;Bona et al 2016) alterations. Our results therefore suggest that considering diatom response not only to trophic conditions but also to physical alterations is crucial in biomonitoring programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…priority effects) or individual spillover from upstream populations (i.e. mass effect), the analysis of the functional profile of diatom communities supports the role of dispersal limitation because the motile guild is dominant in impacted sites, which has been observed to be associated with both hydrological (Elias et al 2015;Falasco et al 2016) and morphological (Smucker and Vis, 2010;Bona et al 2016) alterations. Our results therefore suggest that considering diatom response not only to trophic conditions but also to physical alterations is crucial in biomonitoring programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For instance, high light exposure causes the formation of complex biofilms with multiple layers and enhances the competitive advantage of the MG in nutrient consumption . Diatom communities also change with geology and river typology (Rimet, 2009;Tison et al, 2005), current velocity (Steinman and McIntire, 1986), predation (Feminella and Hawkins, 1995;Steinman, 1996), depth (Cantonati et al, 2009), type of substrate (Cazaubon et al, 1995;Eminson and Moss, 1980;Torrisi et al, 2006), hydrology (Falasco et al, 2016) and according to the presence of humic substances or metals (Morin et al, 2008). The high profile guild, by virtue of its position in contact with the water column, is probably the ecological guild under the influence of the greatest number of factors, including light , current intensity (Passy, 2007;Stenger-Kovács et al, 2013), predation (Steinman, 1996 and exposure to herbicides (Larras et al, 2014;Marcel et al, 2013;Rimet and Bouchez, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, as far as the diatom indices have been conceived, the autecology of the taxa and the indicator species values for indices calculation are focused on the response to organic load and nutrient concentrations. Even though diatoms respond to the hydrological disturbance (Barthès et al., ; Falasco et al., 2016a; Sabater et al., ), its evaluation through community analysis still represent a challenge (Dallas, ; Falasco et al., 2016b). A better definition of the autecology of diatom species in Mediterranean streams could represent a key aspect for a proper quality classification of this stream typology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed five sampling campaigns from April to September 2014, first in spring (April: 17/4/2014), with moderate flow, selected as a control, and the other four were conducted during water scarcity, every month from the end of June to the end of September (June: 30/6/2014; July: 22/7/2014; August: 28/8/2014; September: 24/9/2014). Water scarcity in the selected streams was mainly caused by rainfall scarcity and water uptakes (for further details see Falasco, Piano, & Bona, 2016b). Starting from these considerations and from field observations performed during water scarcity, we used the sampling date as a proxy of the temporal hydrological disturbance, since we observed a progressive and gradual lentification, fragmentation and isolation of stream stretches during summer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%