1968
DOI: 10.1093/milmed/133.1.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suicide by Air Force Personnel 1958 to 1964

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the early 1960s, the lower suicide rates that were observed in the Air Force were attributed to a screening effect (Eggertsen & Goldstein, 1968). The screening of candidates before entry was considered to have resulted in a relatively healthy force with fewer social problems.…”
Section: Protective Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early 1960s, the lower suicide rates that were observed in the Air Force were attributed to a screening effect (Eggertsen & Goldstein, 1968). The screening of candidates before entry was considered to have resulted in a relatively healthy force with fewer social problems.…”
Section: Protective Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and psychologic norms for astronaut selection provided an opportunity to study a randomly Despite these stresses, rates of suicide (3) selected group of flyers. At about age 30, they are somewhat lower and rates of mental hoswere in a stable portion of their life cycle and pitalization and psychiatric disorder (4) are living under the relatively peaceful conditions lower among military flyers during ordinary of 1964.…”
Section: Psyochatric Strenths Wii Weakiesses Of Typical Air Force Pilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal value of cohort designs lies in the opportunity to collect import ant potentially etiologic information on study subjects initially and then to provide an appropriate time for observational follow-up. Thus, typical studies (Miles, 1977) have begun with registers, for example, of patients (Babigian & Odoroff, 1969;Barner-Rasmussen, Dupont, & Billie, 1986;Black, Warrack, & Winokur, 1985;Kiloh, Andrews, & Neilson, 1988;Pokorny, 1966;Winokur & Black, 1987), including previous suicide attempters (Ettlinger, 1964;Paarregaard, 1975;Pederson, Teft, & Babigian, 1975); or of nonpatient cohorts formed by some other characteristic such as place of residence (Hagnell, Lanke, & Rorsman, 1981;Singer, Garfinkel, Cohen, & Srole, 1976), school attendance (Paffenbarger & Asnes, 1966;Paffenbarger, King, & Wing, 1969), or military service (Alleback, Allgulander, & Fisher, 1988;Datel & Johnson, 1979;Datel & Jones, 1981, 1982Eggersten & Goldstein, 1968;Keehn, Goldberg, & Beebe, 1974;Rothberg & Fagan, 1990;Rothberg & McDowell, 1988;Rothberg, Rock, & Jones, 1984;Rothberg, Rock, Shaw, et al, 1988;Selzer & Jablon, 1977).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of military personnel in the United States (Datel & Johnson, 1979;Datel & Jones, 1981, 1982Eggersten & Goldstein, 1968;Keehn et al, 1974;Rothberg & Fagan, 1990;Rothberg & Mc-Dowell, 1988;Rothberg et al, 1984, Selzer & Jablon, 1977 and elsewhere (Allbeck et al, 1988) provide particularly interesting examples of cohorts because they begin with well-defined groups and, at least while members are still serving, provide high levels of accuracy in ascertainment of fact of death, although suicide as the cause may be more problematic. Although military cohorts may not generalize to their parent populations of age-sex nonmilitary peers and may have other selection problems (Selzer & Jablon, 1977), they usually provide a rich source of data recorded at inception of the cohort (i.e., enlistment).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%