2023
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suitability and user acceptance of the eResearch system “Prospective Monitoring and Management App (PIA)”—The example of an epidemiological study on infectious diseases

Abstract: Background The eResearch system “Prospective Monitoring and Management App (PIA)” allows researchers to implement questionnaires on any topic and to manage biosamples. Currently, we use PIA in the longitudinal study ZIFCO (Integrated DZIF Infection Cohort within the German National Cohort) in Hannover (Germany) to investigate e.g. associations of risk factors and infectious diseases. Our aim was to assess user acceptance and compliance to determine suitability of PIA for epidemiological research on transient i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the framework of an additional project “App-based Infection Assessment in RESIST (iAR)”, all participants of the SI cohort who visited the study center for the first study visit, were asked to additionally participate in an app-based monitoring of infectious diseases using PIA. In this intensified infection module, which was designed to be directly comparable to the ZIFCO study 24 , a subgroup of 218 participants volunteered to participate. They received weekly questionnaires to allow reporting on acute infections of the previous week.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the framework of an additional project “App-based Infection Assessment in RESIST (iAR)”, all participants of the SI cohort who visited the study center for the first study visit, were asked to additionally participate in an app-based monitoring of infectious diseases using PIA. In this intensified infection module, which was designed to be directly comparable to the ZIFCO study 24 , a subgroup of 218 participants volunteered to participate. They received weekly questionnaires to allow reporting on acute infections of the previous week.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%