2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42108-020-00075-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suitability of averaged outputs from multiple rainfall-runoff models for hydrological extremes: a case of River Kafu catchment in East Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M8g, AWBM ranked third after SAC and Tank. In several past studies [36,81], AWBM exhibited superlative performances. On the other hand, SMAR exhibited unsatisfactory performance with NSE of 0.46, 0.28 and 0.44 for calibration, validation and entire period, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Model Performance For the Calibration Validation And Entirementioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…M8g, AWBM ranked third after SAC and Tank. In several past studies [36,81], AWBM exhibited superlative performances. On the other hand, SMAR exhibited unsatisfactory performance with NSE of 0.46, 0.28 and 0.44 for calibration, validation and entire period, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Model Performance For the Calibration Validation And Entirementioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, in some studies, e.g. Onyutha et al [36], SMAR generally performed better than SAC and TANK models. This could be attributed to the varying spatial resolution of catchments such as the size, climate, geology, landscape and hydrological data [70,81].…”
Section: Model Performance For the Calibration Validation And Entirementioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations