Suitability of respiratory endoscopy for sampling malignant thoracic tumors for comprehensive genomic profiling

Abstract

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is implemented to detect actionable gene aberrations and design matched therapies. Although malignant thoracic tumors are commonly detected through respiratory endoscopy, it is questionable whether the small specimens obtained thereof are sufficient for CGP. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the suitability of respiratory endoscopy for sampling primary and metastatic thoracic tumors for CGP. Patients whose specimens were collected through respiratory endoscopy and assessed by pathologists to determine their suitability for CGP at our institution between June 2019 and May 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. The suitability of each procedure as a sampling technique for CGP and, in the cases actually analyzed, the distribution of the detected gene aberration were assessed. In total, 122 patients were eligible for analysis; the median age was 61 (range, 29–86) years, and 71 (58.2%) patients were male. Primary intrathoracic tumors were found in 91 (74.6%) cases, including 84 (68.9%) primary lung cancers; the remaining thoracic metastases of extrathoracic origin included various types. The suitability rates of specimens obtained using conventional bronchoscopy with and without cryobiopsy, endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration, and medical thoracoscopy were 82.8% (24/29), 70.4% (19/27), 72.9% (35/48), and 100% (18/18), respectively. Of the 96 cases judged suitable, 83 were subjected to CGP, and all but one were successfully analyzed. Finally, 47 (56.6%) patients had at least one actionable gene aberration and eight (9.6%) were treated with the corresponding targeted therapies. In conclusion, specimens obtained through respiratory endoscopy are suitable for CGP; medical thoracoscopy and cryobiopsy in conventional bronchoscopy are particularly useful.