“…[3][4][5][6][7][8] Despite of a variety of applications for polyhydroquinoline derivatives, very few approaches have been established for the synthesis of these compounds. In recent years, more efficient catalysts have been reported for the synthesis of polyhydroquinolines, such as baker's yeast, [10] Ce(NH 4 ) 2 (NO 3 ) 6 , [11] glycine, [12] grinding, [13] hafnium (IV) bis(perfluorooctanesulfonyl)imide complex in fluorous media, [14] Ni 0.35 Cu 0.25 Zn 0.4 Fe 2 O 4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), [15] Hy-Zeolite, [16] Cu-S-(propyl)-2aminobenzothioate, [17] L-proline and derivatives, [10] metal triflates, [18] molecular iodine, [19] Fe 3 O 4 -adenine-Ni, [20] 4,4′-(butane-1,4-diyl)bis(1-sulfo-1,4-diazabicyclo [2.2.2] octane-1,4-diium)tetrachloride, [21] PTSA, [22] solar thermal energy, [23] MCM-41@Serine@Cu(II), [24] MNPs/DETA-SA, [25] Ni-Cu-Mg Fe 3 O 4 MNPs, [26] ILOS@Fe/TSPP, [27] alginic acid, [28] Ni@IL-OMO, [29] V-TiO 3 [30] and melamine trisulfonic acid. [9] However, this method has some disadvantages like the harsh conditions of the reaction, tedious workup procedure, low yields, use of large quantities of volatile organic solvent and long eaction times.…”