1977
DOI: 10.1021/es60126a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfate and particulate emissions from an oxidation catalyst equipped engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Used engine oil contained, compared to new engine oil, enhanced concentrations of formic acid (CO and acetic acid (C2). Because no n-alkanoic acids in the range C5-C10 were found in engine oil and there is no indication that n-alkanoic acids are part of the fuels used, it is proposed that the higher alkanoic acids (C6-C22) quantified in vehicle exhaust (Table II) are formed during the combustion process ( 63) and/or catalytic oxidation process (catalyst auto only) (64). Given the relatively high emission rates of organic acids from the catalyst-equipped cars when compared to the noncatalyst cars, it is likely that the presence of the catalyst system enhances the formation of organic acids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Used engine oil contained, compared to new engine oil, enhanced concentrations of formic acid (CO and acetic acid (C2). Because no n-alkanoic acids in the range C5-C10 were found in engine oil and there is no indication that n-alkanoic acids are part of the fuels used, it is proposed that the higher alkanoic acids (C6-C22) quantified in vehicle exhaust (Table II) are formed during the combustion process ( 63) and/or catalytic oxidation process (catalyst auto only) (64). Given the relatively high emission rates of organic acids from the catalyst-equipped cars when compared to the noncatalyst cars, it is likely that the presence of the catalyst system enhances the formation of organic acids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other minor aerosol components shown in the profile were taken from Watson's (ref 10, page 96) leaded automobile exhaust profile fine-particle fraction, except for sulfates, which were estimated at 0.45 mg/mile for 0.05% S in the gasoline. The sulfate estimate is based on a scaleup of estimates by Pierson (29), who suggested 0.27 mg/mile sulfates from precatalyst cars using fuel with 0.03% S. 6 This is a composite profile estimated as follows: sulfate fraction from Laresgoiti and Springer (30); carbon fraction from Mulhbaier and Williams (31); other trace species from Watson (10) unleaded auto fine-particle profile (ignoring lead and bromine that were probably due to use of leaded fuel at some point). 0 Watson (ref 10, p^ge 101) diesel-truck fineparticle profile modified by insertion of carbon estimates from Cass et al (26).…”
Section: Receptor Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct exhaust sampling method has also been used by Grimmer (28) and others (3,(29)(30)(31). The exhaust is cooled in one or a series of successively colder traps with a large cooling surface.…”
Section: Sampling Of Vehicle Exhaustmentioning
confidence: 99%